Friday, June 30, 2006

Five Wrong Justices

John Yoo, a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and who served in the Justice Department in 2001-03 has an opinion piece in USA Today Newspaper that says in part:
By putting on hold military commissions to try terrorists for war crimes, five Supreme Court justices have made the legal system part of the problem, rather than part of the solution to the challenges of the war on terrorism. They tossed aside centuries of American history, judicial decisions of long standing, and a December 2005 law ordering them not to interfere with the military trials.
As commander in chief.

President Bush has the authority to decide on wartime tactics and strategies. Presidents Washington, Jackson, Lincoln and FDR settled on military commissions, sometimes with congressional approval and sometimes without, as the best tool to punish and deter enemy war crimes. Bush used them to solve a difficult tension: how to try terrorists fairly without blowing intelligence sources and methods....

What the justices did would have been unthinkable in prior military conflicts: Judicial intervention in the decisions of the president and Congress on how best to wage war. They replaced his wartime judgment and Congress' support with their own speculation that open trials would not run intelligence risks. Their decision to impose specific rules and override political judgments about military necessity mistakes war — inherently unpredictable, and where our government must act quickly and sometimes secretly to protect national security — for the familiarity of the criminal justice system....

To read the rest of Professor Yoo's column click on the title above for a link.....Fighting the War on Terrorism is like an alley knife fight and these are five justices who I would NOT want to cover my back. The same can be said for The New York Times and the majority of Democrats in Congress. History will remember stood and who ran.