Wednesday, May 02, 2007

THE VETO (Update: Upheld)



May 1, 2007

TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:

I am returning herewith without my approval H.R. 1591, the "U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007."

This legislation is objectionable because it would set an arbitrary date for beginning the withdrawal of American troops without regard to conditions on the ground; it would micromanage the commanders in the field by restricting their ability to direct the fight in Iraq; and it contains billions of dollars of spending and other provisions completely unrelated to the war.

Precipitous withdrawal from Iraq is not a plan to bring peace to the region or to make our people safer here at home. The mandated withdrawal in this bill could embolden our enemies -- and confirm their belief that America will not stand behind its commitments. It could lead to a safe haven in Iraq for terrorism that could be used to attack America and freedom-loving people around the world, and is likely to unleash chaos in Iraq that could spread across the region. Ultimately, a precipitous withdrawal could increase the probability that American troops would have to one day return to Iraq -- to confront an even more dangerous enemy. The micromanagement in this legislation is unacceptable because it would create a series of requirements that do not provide the flexibility needed to conduct the war. It would constrict how and where our Armed Forces could engage the enemy and defend the national interest, and would provide confusing guidance on which of our enemies the military could engage. The result would be a marked advantage for our enemies and greater

danger for our troops, as well as an unprecedented interference with the judgments of those who are charged with commanding the military.

Beyond its direction of the operation of the war, the legislation is also unacceptable for including billions of dollars in spending and other provisions that are unrelated to the war, are not an emergency, or are not justified. The Congress should not use an emergency war supplemental to add billions in spending to avoid its own rules for budget discipline and the normal budget process. War supplemental funding bills should remain focused on the war and the needs of our men and women in uniform who are risking their lives to defend our freedoms and preserve our Nation's security.

Finally, this legislation is unconstitutional because it purports to direct the conduct of the operations of the war in a way that infringes upon the powers vested in the Presidency by the Constitution, including as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces. For these reasons, I must veto this bill. GEORGE W. BUSH

THE WHITE HOUSE,

May 1, 2007.

UPDATE: May 2, 2007 - The United States House vote to overturn the VETO of President George W Bush failed today The Veto Stands!

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

Good News!


Our son who is a graduate assistant/researcher in History at a Midwest University has received word he has been awarded a research grant and assistantship for the summer . He will earn as much as he would have had he worked his old job in retail here in Medford which he has done the last four summers.

Thus he can spend the summer doing what he loves researching US history. His schedule is flexible enough he will be able to come home for a few weeks and spend the 4th of July and his birthday with his mom and dad. Our family loves spending the 4th of July in Ashland where they have an old fashioned parade, and concert in the park where before the concert an orator reads the Declaration of Independence.

We are very proud of him!

Sunday, April 29, 2007

Oregon's New Basketball Arena Project.


The picture above is of the model that has been produced for the new University of Oregon Basketball arena for the Oregon Ducks to replace McArthur Court ( Mac Court). The design may change. The smaller arena in the upper right corner is a practice court and the building in the lower right is an academic building for athletes that will now be built someplace else. The arena will be built on the old Williams Bakery property. The Basketball Arena will be surrounded by the Bean Dorm complex to the rear and the Hamilton Dorm complex to your right as you look at the picture. The Hirons store will be to your left on the other side of the small parking lot as you look at the picture.

In today's Register Guard Newspaper Ron Bellamy's column had some additional information on new AD Pat Kilkenny and the Basketball Arena project. Without posting posting the entire column the main points are:

1. "He's reorganized the upper management of the athletic department.... administrators had to apply for their old jobs, they underwent extensive interviews with Kilkenny and a consultant. Some have new roles"

2. He's reach out to the academic side of the Willamette river and has"drawn on the athletics-oriented perspective and institutional history of former assistant football coach Neal Zoumboukos, now a special assistant to Kilkenny"

3. In addition to Jim Bartko, who is commng home from Cal, he will hire "a full-time" fundraiser and will also soon advertise to hire a special assistant to focus on strategic planning."

4. On the basketball arena these are the key points of the column:

(a) He is "determined to build something grand, if the donations support that vision, or something more modest, if that's what the finances dictate, but determined to build an arena, period...."

(b) "The Knights have been considered the
potential source of an "extraordinary gift" to the arena project, and that kind of gift - from them or elsewhere - will determine whether Oregon builds an arena that costs as much as $175 million, based on last year's estimates, or an arena that costs between, say, $75 million and $100 million.

Which Kilkenny is prepared to build, if he must."

"Assuming we didn't get a world-class gift, I thought $75 million with a certain amount of debt would be something the University of Oregon could handle," he said.

Of course, prices go up, almost daily, whether Oregon thinks practical, or thinks grand.

"I'd love to have Phil and Penny involved, and from that perspective they'll let us know if they want to," Kilkenny said. "I think it's fairly clear to him that we'd love to have his help. On the other hand, I'm not going to insult his intelligence by asking for the order, if you will...."


"I'm a big believer in listening to customers. If he's involved, or if anybody gives a very meaningful gift, I would like to know what it is they think we should be doing. I don't think they're going to drive the bus, but I think they're going to have a lot of input."

In a month, Kilkenny hopes to know where this is going, to have a plan. In a month, after all, he'll have, by contract, just 25 months left at Oregon, and you sense he's determined to make every one count, so that he can walk away and "feel really good that 'Gee, wasn't it good that I did that.'

(c) in summary, if Knight kicks in within the month we go "grand" and if not we go "modest" He will know in a "month"

(To read the rest of Bellamy's column click on the title for a link)

Saturday, April 28, 2007

University of Oregon's Spring Football Game


Just got back to Medford from the Spring Game. My wife and I left for the game at 9:30 am this morning and got back home at 8:30 pm It was a nice drive to Eugene and we had a nice dinner in Roseberg at the Elmer's Windmill Inn. I don't claim to be an expert in evaluating football talent but other than a few running plays I didn't see much that gave me a lot of hope next year in view of the Las Vegas Bowl fiasco. I sure hope I am wrong. It was a nice day and I had a good time at Autzen.It was fun listening to Zummer do football commentary with Jerry and Jorgie on the radio.

What I am excited about is the model of the proposed new basketball arena. I went by the Cas Center and saw it on the 2nd floor. The pictures in the newspaper and on the Internet do not do it justice. The seats are very steep in the arena. The arena as proposed will be right in back of the Hamilton Dormitory complex. The entrance will be approximately were the Williams Bakery discount store used to be located. The Arena will have Franklin Blvd on the front, Hamilton complex on the right, with the Bean complex in back and Hyrons to the left as you look at it from Franklin. Of course the layout could change. Pat Kilkenny paid over a million dollars for the plans and this model. Former AD Bill Moos apparently showed this to the big donors but kept it under wraps for the rest of us. My guess he was afraid to show it to anyone else until he had Knight on board as he didn't want to raise expectations . New AD Pat Kilkenny must be more confident he can get it done.

I remember back in 1966 seeing the model for Autzen at the Lane County Fair the year before Autzen stadium was built.

Haven't been to the Cas Center for a few years and it was nice to see the changes. Also went to the "Duck Shop" at the Mo Center and bought a new Oregon Duck tie for work on the days we have our Duck lunches for the Oregon Club of Southern Oregon.

All in all a Good Day!

Now I have to wait four months till Oregon's first football game in Eugene against Houston on September 1, 2007. Go Ducks!

Thursday, April 26, 2007

VETO, VETO, VETO ,VETO, VETO, VETO


VETO the white flag Democrats in Congress!

Article I Section 7 of the United States Constitution


Every bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a law, be presented to the President of the United States; if he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the objections at large on their journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the bill, it shall be sent, together with the objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a law.

Article II Section 2 of the United States Constitution

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States and of the Militia of the several States,....

UPDATE: CAMP DAVID, Md. Apr 27, 2007, President Bush warned Congress Friday that he will continue vetoing war spending bills as long as they contain a timetable for the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq.

UPDATE;Vice president Dick Cheney goes after Democrats Friday night.

"Their prevailing mindset, combined with a series of ill-considered actions in the House and Senate over the last several months," Cheney said, "causes me to wonder whether today's Democratic leaders fully appreciate the nature of this danger that the country faces in the war on terror -- a war that was declared against us by jihadists; a war in which the United States went on offense after 9/11; a war whose central front, in the opinion and actions of the enemy, is Iraq Opponents of our military action there have called Iraq a diversion from the real conflict, a distraction from the business of fighting and defeating bin Laden and the al Qaeda network," Cheney said. "We hear this over and over again . . . Yet the evidence is flatly to the contrary. And the critics conveniently disregard the words of bin Laden himself: 'The most serious issue today for the whole world,' he said, 'is this Third World War [that is] raging' " in Iraq.

Opponents of our military action there have called Iraq a diversion from the real conflict, a distraction from the business of fighting and defeating bin Laden and the al Qaeda network," Cheney said. "We hear this over and over again . . . Yet the evidence is flatly to the contrary. And the critics conveniently disregard the words of bin Laden himself: 'The most serious issue today for the whole world,' he said, 'is this Third World War [that is] raging' " in Iraq.

At one point during the 15-minute speech, Cheney singled out "my friend Senator Harry Reid" for criticism, noting as his audience laughed that he "was one of the many Democrats who voted for the use of force in Iraq."

"And they are entitled to now oppose the war," Cheney said. "Yet Americans are entitled to question whether the endlessly shifting positions he and others are taking are a reflection of principle, or of partisanship and blind opposition to the administration."

was one of the many Democrats who voted for the use of force in Iraq."

"And they are entitled to now oppose the war," Cheney said. "Yet Americans are entitled to question whether the endlessly shifting positions he and others are taking are a reflection of principle, or of partisanship and blind opposition to the administration."

STAND AND FIGHT.... NEVER, NEVER GIVE IN !!!!

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

John McCain's Announcment Speech


Today in New Hampshire John McCain formally announced his candidacy for President of the United States. This is the full text of his announcement speech


Today, I announce my candidacy for President of the United States. I do so grateful for the privileges this country has already given me; mindful that I must seek this responsibility for reasons greater than my self-interest; and determined to use every lesson I've learned through hard experience and the history I've witnessed, every inspiration I've drawn from the patriots I've known and the faith that guides me to meet the challenges of our time, and strengthen this great and good nation upon whom all mankind depends. "We've begun another campaign season earlier than many Americans prefer. So soon after our last contentious election, our differences are again sure to be sharpened and exaggerated. That's the nature of free elections. But even in the heat of a campaign, we shouldn't lose sight that much more defines us than our partisanship; much more unites us than divides us. We have common purposes and common challenges, and we live in momentous times. This election should be about big things, not small ones. Ours are not red state or blue state problems. They are national and global. Half measures and small minded politics are inadequate to the present occasion. We can't muddle through the next four years, bickering among ourselves, and leave to others the work that is ours to do. Greatness is America's destiny, but no nation complacent in its greatness can long sustain it.

"We are fighting a war in two countries, and we're in a global struggle with violent extremists who despise us, our values and modernity itself. If we are to succeed, we must rethink and rebuild the structure and mission of our military; the capabilities of our intelligence and law enforcement agencies; the purposes of our alliances; the reach and scope of our diplomacy; the capacity of all branches of government to defend us. We need to marshal all elements of American power: our military, economy, investment, trade and technology. We need to strengthen our alliances and build support in other nations. We must preserve our moral credibility, and remember that our security and the global progress of our ideals are inextricably linked.
"We all know the war in Iraq has not gone well. We have made mistakes and we have paid grievously for them. We have changed the strategy that failed us, and we have begun to make a little progress. But in the many mistakes we have made in this war, a few lessons have become clear. America should never undertake a war unless we are prepared to do everything necessary to succeed, unless we have a realistic and comprehensive plan for success, and unless all relevant agencies of government are committed to that success. We did not meet this responsibility initially. And we must never repeat that mistake again.

"We must also prepare, far better than we have, to respond quickly and effectively to another terrorist attack or natural calamity. When Americans confront a catastrophe, natural or man-made, they have a right to expect basic competence from their government. They won't accept that firemen and policemen are unable to communicate with each other in an emergency because they don't have the same radio frequency. They won't accept government's failure to deliver bottled water to dehydrated babies or rescue the infirm from a hospital with no electricity. They won't accept substandard care and indifference for wounded veterans.

"That's not good enough for America. And when I'm President, it won't be good enough for me.

"Government spends more money today than ever before. Wasteful spending on things that are not the business of government indebts us to other nations; deprives you of the fruits of your labor; fuels inflation; raises interest rates; and encourages irresponsibility.

"That's not good enough for America. And when I'm President, it won't be good enough for me.

"No government program is the object of more political posturing than Social Security and Medicare. Here's the plain truth: there are too few workers supporting too many retirees, and if we don't make some tough choices today, Social Security and Medicare will go bankrupt or we'll have to raise taxes so drastically we'll crush the prosperity of average Americans. Too many politicians want to ignore the problem, and run for re-election by threatening anyone who wants to fix it.

"That's not good enough for America. And when I'm President, it won't be good enough for me.

"Our tax code is used to game the system for some at the expense of the many instead of encouraging the thrift, investment, innovation and industry of all Americans. It's complexity and waste costs Americans $140 billion in preparation and compliance costs each year.

"That's not good enough for America. And when I'm President, it won't be good enough for me.

"Our dependence on foreign sources of energy not only harms our environment and economy, it endangers our security. So much of the oil we import comes from countries in volatile regions of the world where our values aren't shared and our interests aren't a priority.

"That's not good enough for America. And when I'm President, it won't be good enough for me.

"We're not a country that prefers nostalgia to optimism. We're not a country that would rather go back than forward. We're the world's leader, and leaders don't pine for the past and dread the future. We make the future better than the past. Opening new markets to American goods and services is indispensable to our future prosperity. Lowering trade barriers creates more and better jobs; keeps inflation under control; keeps interest rates low; and makes more goods affordable to more Americans. We won't compete successfully by using old technology to produce old goods. We'll succeed by knowing what to produce and inventing new technologies to produce it.

"But open markets don't automatically translate into a better quality of life for every American. While most gain, some are forced to struggle with very difficult choices. Right now we have a half dozen programs to help displaced workers and another half dozen for people who aren't working at all. We have an unemployment insurance program that's right out of the 1950s, designed to assist workers through a few tough months during an economic downturn.

"That's not good enough for America. And when I'm President, it won't be good enough for me.

"These are some of the challenges that confront us. There are others just as urgent, and during this campaign I'll travel across the country offering my ideas about how we should address them and listening to the concerns and advice of Americans. The American people aren't interested in an election that offers platitudes instead of principles and insults instead of ideas; an election that results - no matter who wins - in four years of unkept promises and a divided government that is little more than a battleground for the next election. They're tired of the old politics. Americans are acutely aware of our problems, and their patience is at an end for politicians who value incumbency over principle, and for partisanship that is less a contest of ideas than an uncivil brawl over the spoils of power. I want my presidency to be an opportunity - an opportunity to fix what we all know needs to be fixed:

"To strengthen our military, intelligence, diplomacy, and law enforcement and use the power of American ideals and commerce to win the war against violent extremists, and help the majority of Muslims who believe in progress and peace to win the struggle for the soul of Islam;

"To balance the federal budget not with smoke and mirrors but by encouraging economic growth and preventing government from spending your money on things it shouldn't; to hold it accountable for the money it does spend on services that only government can provide in ways that don't fail and embarrass you;

"To save Social Security and Medicare on our watch without the tricks, band-aid solutions, lies and posturing that have failed us for too long while the problem became harder and harder to solve;

"To make our tax code simpler, fairer, flatter, more pro-growth and pro-jobs;

"To reduce our dangerous dependence on foreign sources of oil with an energy policy that encourages American industry and technology to make our country safer, cleaner and more prosperous by leading the world in the use, development and discovery of alternative sources of energy;

"To open new markets to American goods and services, create more and better jobs for the American worker and overhaul unemployment insurance and our redundant and outmoded programs for assisting workers who have lost a job that's not coming back to find a job that won't go away;

"To help Americans without health insurance acquire it without bankrupting the country, and ruining the quality of American health care that is the envy of the world;

"To make our public schools more accountable to parents and better able to meet the critical responsibility they have to prepare our children for the challenges they'll face in the world they'll lead.

"When I'm President I'll offer common sense, conservative and comprehensive solutions to these challenges. Congress will have other ideas, and I'll listen to them. I'll work with anyone who is serious and sincere about solving these problems. I expect us to argue over principle, but when a compromise consistent with our principles is within reach, I expect us to seize it. Americans expect us to disagree, but not just to win the next election. They want us to serve the same goal: to ensure that a country blessed with our matchless prosperity, ingenuity, and strength can meet any challenge we confront.

"I won't judge myself by how many elections I've won, but by how well I keep my promises to you. To keep those promises, I can't just win this election by a few votes in a few counties in a few states. I need a mandate from you big enough to convince Congress that Americans want this election to be different. You want to change the politics of selfishness, stalemate and delay; move this country forward and stake our claim on this century as we did in the last. Then I ask you for the opportunity to devote every day of my presidency to making this government work for you, and for a mandate big enough to get the job done.

"I'll challenge myself and each member of Congress to wake up each morning and ask ourselves: will we remember today as the finest day of our public life; the day we worked just for you, not for us? And I'll challenge the American people to reject phony soundbite solutions that have failed us in the past, and hold us accountable for the work you have given us.

"We face formidable challenges, but I'm not afraid of them. I'm prepared for them. I'm not the youngest candidate. But I am the most experienced. I know how the military works, what it can do, what it can do better, and what it should not do. I know how Congress works, and how to make it work for the country and not just the re-election of its members. I know how the world works. I know the good and the evil in it. I know how to work with leaders who share our dreams of a freer, safer and more prosperous world, and how to stand up to those who don't. I know how to fight and how to make peace. I know who I am and what I want to do.

"I don't seek the office out of a sense of entitlement. I owe America more than she has ever owed me. Thirty-four years ago, I came home from an extended absence abroad. While I was away, I fell in love with my country. I learned that what's good for America, is good enough for me. I have been an imperfect servant of my country ever since, in uniform and in office, in war and peace. I have never lived a single day, in good times or in bad, that I haven't thanked God for the privilege. "You can't sell me on hopelessness. You can't convince me our problems are insurmountable. Our challenges are an opportunity to write another chapter of American greatness. We must seize it, and those of us privileged to lead America must remember the principles that made us great, have the faith to stand by them, the integrity to honor our public trust, and the courage to keep our promise to put the nation's interests before our own. Don't tell me what we can't do. Don't tell me we can't make our country stronger, and the world safer. We can. We must. And when I'm President we will.
"I'm not running for President to be somebody, but to do something; to do the hard but necessary things not the easy and needless things. I'm running for President to protect our country from harm and defeat its enemies. I'm running for President to make the government do its job, not your job; to do it with less and to do it better. I'm not running to leave our biggest problems to an unluckier generation of leaders, but to fix them now, and fix them well. I'm running for President to make sure America maintains its place as the political and economic leader of the world; the country that doesn't fear change, but makes change work for us; the country that doesn't long for the good old days, but aspires to even better days. I'm running for President of the United States; not yesterday's country; not a defeated country; not a bankrupt country; not a timid and frightened country; not a country fragmented into bickering interest groups with no sense of the national interest; not a country with a bloated, irresponsible and incompetent government. I'm running for President of the United States, a blessed country, a proud country, a hopeful country, the most powerful and prosperous country and the greatest force for good on earth. And when I'm President, I intend to keep it so."

War on terror by Tony Blackley

Watching (and participating in) the intense Iraq War and War on Terror debate both in the United States and in Europe -- and the politics that flows from it, a sense of futility is increasingly hard to resist. Our nation and Europe seem to have hardened in their divisions on those topics....

For those of us who support the great struggle against radical Islam, the world reality could not be plainer. The threat of radical Islam is not merely a few thousand terrorists using small explosives to kill a few dozen people at a time -- usually in the faraway Middle East. Rather, it is an historic recrudescence of a violent, conquering old tradition of Islam that almost overwhelmed the world from the Seventh Century until as recently as the 17th century. It is radicalizing the minds of increasing numbers of the world's 1.4 billion Muslims to be very aggressive culturally, as well as violent -- from Africa to Indonesia, to Cairo to Ankara, to Paris, to Rotterdam to London to Falls Church, Va.

To us, no fair and objective assessment of the state of radical Islam can deny these implications. One must not see the denouement of the Iraq War outside that context. To those who disagree with our view of reality, we are quite ready to impute anything from ignorance, to willful ignorance, to moral cowardice to treason. Those who disagree with us find our alarmism as noxious as we find their willful blindness to reality.

And so the debate stands. Every political decision -- from the Iraq war appropriation vote this week, to the Patriot Act, to the status of Guantanamo Prison, to NSA intercepts, to the presidential election -- is seen through our conceptual squint of the threat or non-threat from radical Islam.

Neither side seems remotely capable of persuading the other of the accuracy of our respective foresights.....

Thus, while others and I will continue to make our case in public, it seems probably inevitable that the correctness or incorrectness of our views will only become persuasive to the multitude when history teaches its cruel, unavoidable lessons. It was ever thus, which is why history is strewed with broken nations and civilizations that couldn't read the writing on the wall. Of course, it is also strewed with sad hulks of false predictors of doom.

(To read to rest of Mr Blackley's column click on the title for a link)

Bartko and Arena Project


Ron Bellamy in today's Eugene Register Guard has a good review of Jim Bartko and the basketball arena project. Where we have been and where we hope to go in getting it done. Needle to say there has been a lot of politics. It also states that a scale model of the proposed basketball arena will be taken out of mothballs and will go on display on the 2nd floor of the Casanova Center.To read the Bellamy column click on the title for a link.

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Knights Templar


In a play on words Oregonian sports columnist John Canzano likened the gathering together of Phil Knight , Jim Bartko and Pat Kilkenny, to build a new basketball arena for the University of Oregon, to the return of the Knights Templar's to Eugene ....so a little history lesson is in order.


The Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon (Latin: Pauperes commilitones Christi Templique Solomonici), popularly known as the Knights Templar or the Order of the Temple, were the first and among the most famous of the Christian military orders. The organisation, which existed for approximately two centuries in the Middle Ages, was created in the aftermath of the First Crusade of 1096 to ensure the safety of the large numbers of European pilgrims who flowed toward Jerusalem after its conquest.

Officially endorsed by the church in 1129, the Order became a favoured charity across Europe, and grew rapidly in membership and power. Templar knights, easily recognisable in their white mantle with a distinct red cross, made some of the best equipped, trained, and disciplined fighting units of the Crusades.[3] Non-warrior members of the Order managed a large economic infrastructure throughout Christendom, innovating many financial techniques that were an early form of banking,[4] and building numerous fortifications throughout Europe and the Holy Land.

The success of the Templars was tied closely to the success of the Crusades. When the Holy Land was lost and the Templars suffered crushing defeats, support for the Order's existence faltered. Rumours about the Templars' secret initiation ceremony caused mistrust, and King Philip IV of France, deeply in debt to the Order, began pressuring Pope Clement V to take action. Things came to a head on Friday, October 13, 1307, when King Philip caused many of the Order's members in France to be arrested, tortured into "confessions", and burned at the stake.[5] In 1312, Pope Clement, under further pressure from King Philip, forcibly disbanded the entire Order. The sudden disappearance of a major part of the European infrastructure gave rise to speculation and legends, which have kept the name "Templar" alive in modern fiction.


The above information is from the Internet encyclopedia wikipodia to read the rest of it's listing click on the title for a link.

Oregonian: " Bartko's Back"


The Oregonian has also now confirmed that Jim Bartko is coming back to the University of Oregon Athletic Department starting on May 14.

EUGENE -- University of Oregon Athletic Director Pat Kilkenny confirmed Tuesday that Jim Bartko has agreed to a position as senior associate athletic director, a hiring that could turn plans for a basketball arena into reality.

Bartko, who left Oregon less than a year ago for a similar position at the University of California, will be in charge of men's and women's golf and lacrosse and will assist in the fundraising efforts for the 2008 U.S. Olympic Trials for track and field. But his main focus will be securing the help of key contributors in efforts to build an arena to replace 80-year-old McArthur Court.

"He will certainly help provide a lot of energy to that relationship," Kilkenny said of Bartkos close ties with Nike and co-founder Phil Knight. "It's a significant advance over my relationship."

Bartko served as liaison between Knight and then-athletic director Bill Moos before leaving UO for Berkeley, Calif., in July 2006.

Bartko's starting date is May 14.


Oregon Athletic Director will also hire an additional fund raiser:

Kilkenny said there will be a job opening posted within a week for another fundraising position. He hopes to fill that spot by July.


(To read the rest of the Oregonian news story click on the title for a link)

Jim Bartko's Back... Jim Bartko's Back!!!! ( or " the Knights Templars are assembling in Eugene" )


In an update on their web site the Eugene Register Guard newspaper has confirmed, with Jim Bartko, that he is coming back to the University of Oregon.

"I think there are some great things that can be done and that I can be a small part of,” Bartko told The Register-Guard."

"In his role as senior associate AD, Bartko will be involved with the arena project, with planning for the 2008 Olympic Trials and with funding long-term sources of funding for the athletic department."

"More details in Wednesday’s Register-Guard."


An official announcement is expected as soon as Wednesday.

To quote Oregonian sports columnist John Canzano in today's Oregonian:

With Knight on board with the arena project, and booster/friend Kilkenny serving as athletic director, and Bartko seemingly headed back, it feels as if the Knights Templars are assembling in Eugene.


A Good day for the Ducks! Go Ducks!

(To read the update in the Register Guard click on the title above for a link)

Monday, April 23, 2007

Come Home Jim Bartko



For some time I have heard rumors that former University of Oregon Assistant AD is coming home to the Ducks. Oregonian sports columnist John Canzano is now reporting it on his blog.

Whisper from Eugene is that Jim Bartko will be hired as Senior Associate AD later this week in Eugene. I'm told, if it happens, he'll work under AD Pat Killkenny, who's aim is getting that arena built. Nobody will give official confirmation of this yet, but multiple sources tell me Bartko is a lock.

Remember, he left to help Cal fundraise as an associate AD there, and this ends up as an interesting potential hire for a couple of reasons... A) Bartko knows where the money is buried in Eugene; and B) He's likely the front runner for Killkenny's job when Mr. K leaves his post in two years.

Keep in mind, Bartko was the guy walking around charged with making sure Phil Knight was happy and taken care of all those years.


Jim is a good guy and this is great news. This is what I posted on this blog on February 21 of this year when Pat Kilkenny was hired as AD :"A good hire for Kilkenny would be to get Jim Bartko to come back from Cal in some capacity. I understand they are close." Jim will be a big help in getting the new basketball arena built. I am of the opinion that the beginning of the end for Bill Moos as Oregon AD was when he let Jim Bartko leave the Ducks for the University of California at Berkeley.Many fans saw that as the end of any chance of getting the basketball arena built as long as Moos was AD. Not soon thereafter Moos was given an almost 2 million dollar golden parachute to leave. To read the rest of Canzano's blog click on the title above for a link.

V J Day ( Victory over Japan Day)



For various reason I have always been interested in V J Day. Here is a recollection of what it was like on V J Day in Salt Lake City, Utah:

And it was a celebration.

GIs on leave and in uniform were the center of attention. Soldiers, sailors, marines and pretty girls. . .snake-danced up and down Main from South Temple to Broadway.

And in the early evening, as I watched from the second-floor windows, I could see the Salt Lake City Police Department paddy wagon, the ``Black Maria,'' used to cart drunks to jail, trying to drive across Main at 200 South, but finally slowed to a halt in front of the Owl Drug under the Walker Bank Building on the southeast corner.

The officer, doggedly trying to do his duty, had a wagon full of inebriates.

And as I watched, I could see him being surrounded by a score of partying celebrants, chanting for the officer to join them. Before he knew it, a couple of soldiers had pulled his keys from his belt and opened the door to the police wagon.

Once the passengers were repatriated, so to speak, the revelers tossed the officer's keys into a U.S. mailbox nearby, leaving the patrol wagon stranded and empty.

The whooping and hollering went on well into the next morning.

The war was over


Of course the picture of the sailor and the nurse was taken in New York City on V J Day over 61 years ago.( Click on the title above for a link to the full story of one man's recolection of V J day in Salt Lake City, Utah.)

Sunday, April 22, 2007

Lottery Winner!


"The greatest gift we can leave the generations to follow is to school them in the values and ideals that set America apart, and to instill in them not only a love of country, but also a fierce pride.

They should see the word "America" on their birth certificate and know they're holding the supreme winning lottery ticket."
Nolan Finley
(To read the rest of r Finley's column click on the title above for a link)

Hillary & Taxes


According to the Congress's Joint Committee on Taxation, 53.7 percent of all federal income taxes were paid by those with incomes over $200,000 in 2006.
Those with incomes between $100,000 and $200,000 paid 28.3 percent of all individual income taxes.
Consequently, those with incomes over $100,000 paid 82 percent of the total; they also paid 44.4 percent of all payroll taxes.
For tax year 2004, the top 25 percent of earners paid 84.86 percent of the total taxes.

Hillary Clinton, April 21, during her campaign stop in Iowa.... said she would raise taxes for the wealthy, who she said "aren't paying their fair share."

"We need to get back to fiscal responsibility," she said.


Yes, the old "Class Warfare" argument... the Democrats love to go after the "rich". As Reagan used to say:
We have so many people who can't see a fat man standing beside a thin one without coming to the conclusion that the fat man got that way by taking advantage of the thin one!


(For a link to the statistics on taxes outlined above click on the title above)

Saturday, April 21, 2007

Movie Review: The Hoax



This afternoon my wife and I went to Tinseltown to see "The Hoax". It's an excellent movie based on the controversial true story. Clifford Irving (Richard Gere) was a failed writer in the 1970s who couldn't sell a book to save his life. That is, until he claimed reclusive billionaire Howard Hughes dictated his life to him, which was, of course, a flat-out lie. As The Autobiography of Howard Hughes got published and became an instant hit, Irving had to continue to spin an increasingly convoluted web of lies to prove his book was authentic. I followed the story in the early 1970's while a student at the University of Oregon. The movie has as a back drop Watergate and the Vietnam war. The movie has a good feel for the times and is a very fascinating story that really happened. I enjoyed the New York publishing business's aspect of the movie. I give it *****. After the movie I ask my wife why the movie had not received more hype since I thought it was "Best Picture" material and she said the movie had limited appeal to mostly "Older folks" like me. I did notice that the audience at our showing was made up almost exclusively of people in their 50's & 60"s who were alive in the early 1970's. Go see it you will like it! To read more about the movie click on the title for a link to the IMDB page for the movie.

"Roaming Ambassador to the World"


Hillary Rodham Clinton said Saturday that if she is elected president, she would make her husband a roaming ambassador to the world.
Anything to get him away from the house .... the White House.... yes, Hillary we understand.

History Provides a Lesson on the Present!

To protect our children's privacy and to not link them to their opinionated dad I don't mention them much on this blog. However, I received special permission for this post.
Our son is a graduate student working in the Midwest as a teaching/research assistant for the History department of a university. He is pursuing his goal of becoming a college history professor. His major area of interest is Abraham Lincoln and the emancipation of slavery by Lincoln. This last weekend he flew home to Oregon to speak at the convention of the Oregon College Republicans being held at Sun River near Bend. He was asked to give the preliminary introduction to a speech by Don Malarkey one of the real "Band of Brothers" portrayed in the HBO mini series about World War II of the same name. His Introduction was as follows:


Greetings my fellow College Republicans,

Many of you might remember me as the former Chairman of the Willamette College Republicans. Currently I’m in my first year working towards a graduate degree, hoping to eventually become a professor in history. Even though my area of focus is in the past, I can’t help but be an active observer of today. Yet with my understanding of today, I’m also an observer of the past.

Let me begin by describing the opposition faced by a past wartime president.

Coming into office he was criticized for not having any foreign policy experience.

The eastern establishment despised his plain spokeness, colloquial manner, and backwoods accent.

His intelligence was mocked, described as a ‘first rate second rate.’

Opponents referred to him as a primate, calling him the ‘original orangutan.’

He was described as a fanatic, blood thirsty and despotic.

He was described as a tyrant running roughshod over civil liberties, trampling constitutional protections in his conduct of an illegal war.

His political opponents resented the fact that in his political speeches the President invoked his own faith in a supreme creator of the Universe.

During the war, the original self-interest justification for the war was modified so that the new aims were to set other men free; a move irksome to more than a few.

Political cartoons showed the President with his foot on the Constitution being consulted by the devil.

Also during the war, the president wrote a consoling letter to a bereaved mother of the conflict. The mother, opposed to the President and his cause, in tern spoke out against the President.

During the President’s reelection campaign, in the middle of the war, a former member of the army ran against the president, nominated by a party advocating a cut and run platform.

The opposition the President faced was not just from the opposing party. He received criticism from within his own party, as they criticized him for not supporting the party ideology rigidly enough.

With exception to a small loyal base of the population who maintained their faith in the President, observers on all sides of the political spectrum expressed their disillusion and lack of faith in the president.

Indeed, the first part of his last year in office was his darkest, his popularity (while not scientifically calculated like today) was at its lowest. His prospect for reelection was heavily doubtful. Yet Union victories changed all that. We in America like a winner. Sherman’s capture of Atlanta, and eventual destruction of the Confederacy turned public opinion around on the President.

His assassination both shocked and silenced his critics. His legacy now belongs to the ages. His accomplishments in protecting the United States and spreading human freedom enshrine him in the hearts of nearly all Americans. His likeness is printed on our currency, adorns monuments around the Capital, and etched on our mountains.

I am of course talking about Abraham Lincoln. Yet in a general sense, my description of the opposition to Lincoln is exactly the same as those of our current president.

Of course, it’s not my intention here to place President Bush on the same pedestal as Lincoln. It would be a cruel exercise for anyone to be measured up with him. However, it must be known the criticisms and unpopularity directed towards President Bush today are not new. Our greatest President faced these same kinds of criticisms during his war time experience.

Yet, let me make one last comparison with the Civil War and the war on terrorism, and that is the change in nature of the war. The original justification for the war in Iraq was of course the acquisition by Saddam Hussein of WMDs. These justifications were of course made in good faith. Yet in retrospect the questions over the actual existence of new WMD’s, a judgment originally of consensus by all sides of the political spectrum, remain an open question.

However, the war in Iraq was not just about WMD’s. It was also about removing an unstable dictator of the region, and changing its nature. The war on Terrorism is not merely a punitive action toward the perpetrators of 9/11, if indeed it is about that at all, rather it is about attacking the root cause of terrorism—the Middle East’s culture of despotism. By removing an unstable dictator and sewing the seeds of liberalized democracy, we can put greater pressure on the region for change. By effecting this change not only do we restore the natural rights of people abroad, but in ensuring for them a politically satisfying life, we remove the passions and depravity which has allowed sinister leaders to turn their followers against the West. Thus, freedom for the Iraqis and beyond is not mere altruism, but within our own self interest.

In a certain sense, this is much like the reasoning for the Civil War’s turn in aims. In order to save the Union and preserve the liberties established by the American founding, Lincoln found it necessary to expand freedom to the enslaved as a wartime necessity.

In his message to Congress on December 1862 Lincoln writes:

“We say we are for the Union. The world will not forget that we say this. We know how to save the Union. The world knows we know how to save it. We—even we here—hold the power and bear the responsibility. In giving freedom to the slave, we assure freedom to the free—honorable alike in what we give and what we preserve. We shall nobly save or meanly lose, the last best hope of earth.”

Of course, one of our speakers to follow knows all to well the need to expand freedom abroad, to protect our own homeland. Don Malarkey fought against the fascist Nazi regime in Europe, bringing freedom to the Western half of Germany—the American and British occupied half, and stabilized the western half of Europe. Of course I will let Vance (Vance Day Chairman of the Oregon Republican Party) give you the full introduction for this real life member of the “Band of Brothers"


Needles to say his mother and I are very proud of him.

Oregon Duck Football Tickets


This week I ordered my 2007 Oregon Duck Football tickets for section 13. We have had two season tickets for the University of Oregon Ducks for the last 17 years. They have 7 home games this year including U$C and the Oregon State Beavers for the Civil War game. They open against Houston in Eugene on Saturday September 1st.(Labor Day Weekend) The Spring game will be next Saturday April 28th. Go Ducks!

William Kristol: I stand with John McCain


McCain v. Reid
Friday, Apr. 20, 2007 By WILLIAM KRISTOL

"We, who are willing to support this new strategy, and give General Petraeus the time and support he needs, have chosen a hard road. But it is the right road. It is necessary and just. Democrats, who deny our soldiers the means to prevent an American defeat, have chosen another road. It may appear to be the easier course of action, but it is a much more reckless one, and it does them no credit even if it gives them an advantage in the next election. This is an historic choice, with ramifications for Americans not even born yet. Let's put aside for a moment the small politics of the day. The judgment of history should be the approval we seek, not the temporary favor of the latest public opinion poll." Sen. John McCain (R-Az.), speaking at the Virginia Military Institute, April 11, 2007

"We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war. Senator Schumer has shown me numbers that are compelling and astounding." Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), speaking to reporters, April 12, 2007

"This war is lost." Reid, April 19, 2007

Usually, politics is a murky business — gray upon gray, one set of mixed motives jostling with another. But sometimes there is a time for choosing — between courage and cynicism, between honor and disgrace.

John McCain's speech to the cadets of the Virginia Military Institute is the best single analysis by any political figure of where we stand in the war in Iraq. It is a serious and sober attempt to persuade the American people that the war is winnable, that we should give Gen. Petraeus a chance to win it, and that accepting defeat would be both ignoble and disastrous to American interests. With this morally and intellectually impressive speech, John McCain took leadership of the fight for victory in Iraq.

McCain was hard on the opponents of the war here at home. He didn't just describe troop withdrawal proposals as unwise. He derided "the fanciful and self-interested debates about Iraq that substitute for statesmanship in Washington." And he suggested that the Democrats had decided "to take advantage of the public's frustration, accept defeat," and hope that "the politics of defeat" would benefit them.

McCain continued: "In Washington, where political calculation seems to trump all other considerations, Democrats in Congress and their leading candidates for President, heedless of the terrible consequences of our failure, unanimously confirmed our new commander, and then insisted he be prevented from taking the action he believes necessary to safeguard our country's interests....I watched with regret as the House of Representatives voted to deny our troops the support necessary to carry out their new mission. Democratic leaders smiled and cheered as the last votes were counted. What were they celebrating? Defeat? Surrender? In Iraq, only our enemies were cheering."

Tough words — especially because, here in America, much of the mainstream media was also cheering. McCain, a onetime media favorite when he last ran for president, was effectively forswearing the possibility of regaining their favor.

Meanwhile, the mainstream media paid little attention to Harry Reid's comments quoted above. Republican criticisms of them were treated as the normal tit-for-tat of partisan politics. Reid's cynicism wasn't thought noteworthy, and his defeatism wasn't thought extraordinary. Apparently, cynicism in the service of the defeat of Republicans is no vice. Undercutting the efforts of American troops you have voted to send to fight in a war is a virtue.

Earlier this month, the "surge" was beginning visibly to work. Al Qaeda fought back, with massive slaughter of civilians, whose purpose was in part to undercut support for the war against al Qaeda on the home front. Harry Reid followed script.

Now we are at a moment of truth. There is McCain's way, a way of difficulty and honor. There is Reid's way, a way of political expediency and dishonor. McCain may lose the political battle at home, and the U.S. may ultimately lose in Iraq. But some of us will always be proud, at this moment of choice, to have stood with McCain, and our soldiers, and our country.

Friday, April 20, 2007

History Repeats Itself


Latter-Day Copperhead

"I believe . . . that this war is lost, and this surge is not accomplishing anything, as is shown by the extreme violence in Iraq this week."--Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, April 19, 2007


"Resolved, that this convention does explicitly declare, as the sense of the American people, that after four years of failure to restore the Union by the experiment of war, during which, under the pretence of military necessity, or war power higher than the Constitution, the Constitution itself has been disregarded in every part, and public liberty and private right alike trodden down, and the material prosperity of the country essentially impaired, justice, humanity, liberty, and the public welfare demand that immediate efforts be made for a cessation of hostilities, with a view to an ultimate convention of the States or other peaceable means, to the end that at the earliest practicable moment peace may be restored on the basis of the federal Union of the States."--1864 Democratic platform

Thursday, April 19, 2007

Top 15 Movies Directed by John Ford

The following are my favorite movies Directed by the "Old Master" John Ford. I have listed them in the order in which they were made.

1. Stagecoach (1939) Movie that made John Wayne a star.

2. Young Mr Lincoln (1939) Henry Fonda as Lincoln as a young lawyer in Illinois

3. Drums Along the Mohawk (1939) Henry Fonda again. The Revolutionary War on the frontier

4. The Grapes of Wrath (1940) The American depression. Henry Fonda (Awarded the Academy Award for Best Director)

5. How Green Was My Valley (1941) A Welsh coal mining village.He patterned the family after his Irish family (Awarded the Academy Award for Best Director and Best Picture)

6. The Battle of Midway (1942) Documentary about the World War II battle. Ford was in the navy and was there and filmed the battle as it happened. Later in life he wore a patch over one eye due to injuries he suffered during the battle that turned the tide of the war in the Pacific.(Awarded an Academy Award for Best Documentary)

7. They Were Expendable (1945) With John Wayne. A bitter sweet story about the use of PT boats in the hopeless defense of the Philippines in the early days of World War II. Ford drew on his own war time experiences. My favorite Ford movie. I can and do watch it over and over. Donna Reed is wonderful as a Navy nurse who is left to be captured by the Japanese at Corregidor.No whiners in this movie just stoic courage and loyalty.

8. My Darling Clementine(1946) Henry Fonda as Wyatt Earp at the Gunfight at the OK Corral. Filmed in Monument Valley

9. Fort Apache (1948) Wayne and Fonda. The first of the Calvary Trilogy

10. She Wore a Yellow Ribbon(1949) My favorite John Wayne movie about the U.S Cavalry

11. Rio Grande(1950) Wayne and Maureen O'Hara in the last of the Calvary Trilogy. Ford drew upon his feelings of loyalty, comradeship and sacrifice he had learned in World War II. The Calvary was a true "Band of Brothers".

12. The Quiet Man (1952) Wayne and O'Hara in the movie Ford always wanted to make about his family's home in Ireland. Ford was in love with O'Hara and used Wayne as a stand in.(Awarded Academy Award for Best Director)

13. The Searchers (1956) Wayne in one of his best roles.Filmed in Monument Valley and it has never looked better. I love this movie.

14. The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance (1962) Jimmy Stewart and John Wayne in a western about fact and legend. When legend becomes fact print the legend.

15. How the West Was Won (1962) Ford directed the Civil War segment.

Ford also won a 4th Academy Award for the Informer in 1935

For more on John Ford click on the title for a link to his Wikipedia page. As long as people love film John Ford will be honored and remembered. An American original!

Democratic Leader: War in Iraq "Is Lost"


While American troops are in battle against the enemy the Democratic Majority Leader in the United States Senate, Harry Reid said:

The war in Iraq "is lost" and a US troop surge is failing to bring peace to the country,

The same party that brought us defeat in Vietnam (see picture above) now wants to bring defeat to the United States in Iraq and all the middle east.

As John McCain said last week at VMI:
Before I left for Iraq, I watched with regret as the House of Representatives voted to deny our troops the support necessary to carry out their new mission. Democratic leaders smiled and cheered as the last votes were counted. What were they celebrating? Defeat? Surrender? In Iraq, only our enemies were cheering. A defeat for the United States is a cause for mourning not celebrating. And determining how the United States can avert such a disaster should encourage the most sober, public-spirited reasoning among our elected leaders not the giddy anticipation of the next election. Democrats who voted to authorize this war, and criticized the failed strategy that has led us to this perilous moment, have the same responsibility I do, to offer support when that failure is recognized and the right strategy is proposed and the right commanders take the field to implement it or, at the least, to offer an alternative strategy that has some relationship to reality.


I will give Senator Reid the benefit of the doubt as to his sincerity. However the enemies of freedom and the terrorist of the world are happy to see the white flag of surrender by the Democrats in Congress.

(Picture above is the evacuation from the U.S. Embassy in Vietnam after the Democrats in Congress brought defeat in that war by cutting off the funds to the South Vietnamese and would not even allow the United States to provide them with air support. Will history repeat itself?)

“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman.” — “The Crisis”, Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

"Heroes in Hell's Midst" by Maggie Gallagher

Maggie Gallagher has a column about the murder of 32 students at Virginia Tech. She talks about the heroes of that day and ends the column:

Why do they kill? Who cares? The explanation varies in the details, but the basic script is the same: They are men who choose murder to combat humiliation, to reign for a few ghastly moments in hell, rather than to serve in heaven.

How do some facing hell find the courage to act to stop it? That's what I want to know


(To read the rest click on the title for a link)

The Evil Men Do

Helle Dale in an Op-Ed column in today's Washington Times makes a good point at the conclusion of the column:

Does blame attach itself to the actions of the university leadership? The decisions that were taken do indeed seem incomprehensible in the light of what followed. Further investigation is certainly warranted of those actions. This is a tragedy for the entire university community.
In terms of American foreign policy and Iraq, blame invariably attaches itself to the White House and the president whenever violence takes place. As the going has gotten tough in Iraq and sectarian violence escalated, the United States has tended to get blamed, rather than the perpetrators of the violence itself. As the nation grieves so many young lives being lost, it crucial that we recall who the real culprits are, those for whom fellow human lives mean absolutely nothing as they take their anger out on the world.


(To read the rest of the column click on the title above for a link)