Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Bill Moos a Husky?


Former Oregon Athletic Director Bill Moos may get his wish to become the Athletic Director as the University of Washington. Bill Moos in 2004 as Oregon Athletic Director publicly sought the Husky job after Barbra Hedges quite. The University of Washington instead hired Todd Turner who today was fired/resigned and who is a candidate to replace him... you got it.... Bill Moos. The Seattle Times says:

Potential candidates could include:

*Former Oregon athletic director Bill Moos, who now lives in eastern Washington but would have to forfeit a $1.85 million 10-year non-compete deal made when he left the Ducks.


Oregon fans were very upset when Moos publicly angled for the job because when he came to Oregon he said he wanted to make the University of Oregon the premier athletic department in the Northwest. Then, when Moos angered Phil Knight of Nike and when it was obvious Phil Knight would not donate money for a new basketball arena until Moos left Oregon paid Moos $1.85 million to leave. He left and Phil Knight donated $100 million to the University of Oregon Athletic Department and Oregon is moving forward in building a new basketball arena.

Yes, give us our $1.85 back or excuse the obligation and you Huskies can have him.

National Review Endorses Romney


National Review, the magazine I grew up with as a Conservative just endorsed Mitt Romney for President. Is it time for conservative to rally to Romney? I still am undecided but am inching toward Romney IF he can win in Iowa. National Review while influential does not have the influence it had when it was almost alone as the conservatives only source of conservative news and analysis. Now there are so many other sources.... but I still give it's endorsement a great deal of weight. To read the editorial click on the title above for a link. I particularly like the analysis on why they did not endorse the other candidates. Some quotes from the editorial endorsment:

Our guiding principle has always been to select the most conservative viable candidate. In our judgment, that candidate is Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts. Unlike some other candidates in the race, Romney is a full-spectrum conservative: a supporter of free-market economics and limited government, moral causes such as the right to life and the preservation of marriage, and a foreign policy based on the national interest. While he has not talked much about the importance of resisting ethnic balkanization — none of the major candidates has — he supports enforcing the immigration laws and opposes amnesty. Those are important steps in the right direction.

Uniting the conservative coalition is not enough to win a presidential election, but it is a prerequisite for building on that coalition. Rudolph Giuliani did extraordinary work as mayor of New York and was inspirational on 9/11. But he and Mike Huckabee would pull apart the coalition from opposite ends: Giuliani alienating the social conservatives, and Huckabee the economic (and foreign-policy) conservatives. A Republican party that abandoned either limited government or moral standards would be much diminished in the service it could give the country.

Two other major candidates would be able to keep the coalition together, but have drawbacks of their own. John McCain is not as conservative as Romney. He sponsored and still champions a campaign-finance law that impinged on fundamental rights of political speech; he voted against the Bush tax cuts; he supported this year’s amnesty bill, although he now says he understands the need to control the border before doing anything else.

Despite all that and more, he is a hero with a record that is far more good than bad. He has been a strong and farsighted supporter of the Iraq War, and, in a trying political season for him, he has preserved and even enhanced his reputation for dignity and seriousness. There would be worse nominees for the GOP (see above). But McCain ran an ineffectual campaign for most of the year and is still paying for it.

Fred Thompson is as conservative as Romney, and has distinguished himself with serious proposals on Social Security, immigration, and defense. But Thompson has never run any large enterprise — and he has not run his campaign well, either. Conservatives were excited this spring to hear that he might enter the race, but have been disappointed by the reality. He has been fading in crucial early states. He has not yet passed the threshold test of establishing for voters that he truly wants to be president......


He still has some convincing to do with other conservatives. Romney has been plagued by the sense that his is a passionless, paint-by-the-numbers conservatism. If he is to win the nomination, he will have to show more of the kind of emotion and resolve he demonstrated in his College Station “Faith in America” speech.

For some people, Romney’s Mormonism is still a barrier. But we are not electing a pastor. The notion that he will somehow be controlled by Salt Lake City or engaged in evangelism for his church is outlandish. He deserves to be judged on his considerable merits as a potential president. As he argued in his College Station speech, his faith informs his values, which he has demonstrated in both the private and public sectors. In none of these cases have any specific doctrines of his church affected the quality of his leadership. Romney is an exemplary family man and a patriot whose character matches the high office to which he aspires.

More than the other primary candidates, Romney has President Bush’s virtues and avoids his flaws. His moral positions, and his instincts on taxes and foreign policy, are the same. But he is less inclined to federal activism, less tolerant of overspending, better able to defend conservative positions in debate, and more likely to demand performance from his subordinates. A winning combination, by our lights. In this most fluid and unpredictable Republican field, we vote for Mitt Romney.

Favorite Movies about Christmas


I am a sucker for movies about Christmas. This time of year my wife is always watching those, non stop, Christmas movies made for TV on the Lifetime and ABC Family TV cable channels. I will be watching FOX NEWS on the TV in the room where I am and will walk by the TV my wife is watching and will watch a few minutes and I am hooked. It's fun to watch these TV movies because you see actresses and actors who you haven't seen for a while, because they are on the down hill slide in their careers, and will work cheep. One in a while you will see a movie made before an actor became famous. I have gotten so I remember movies they showed last year and the year before. However my favorite movies about Christmas are the classics that were originally shown in theaters. The following is my list of my favorite movies about Christmas. I decided the test for a movie to make the list is have I purchased it on DVD. Here is the list in order of preference in reverse order.

4. National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation (1989)

Stars Chey Chase in a very funny movie. I see a lot of me and my family in this movie, trying to have the "perfect" Christmas. The scenes with the old folks who come over for Christmas eve dinner reminds me of Uncle Herman and Mrs Hills and others who my folks would invite over for Christmas. They are all gone now but the memories remain.

3. Meet Me in St Louis (1944)

A Judy Garland classic. About an upper middle class family in turn of the century St Louis ( young folks the one in 1900). The movie focus in on a group of young people (They didn't call them teenagers then) who are excited about the coming of the Worlds Fair to St Louis and their trials and loves. The dad, who is a lawyer, gets a job at a prestigious firm in New York and causes a crisis that hits it's boiling point at Christmas. Garland sings "Have yourself a Merry Little Christmas" that is a show stopper and is one of those moments you never forget.

2. White Christmas (1954)

What can I say, Bing Crosby, Danny Kaye and Rosemary Clooney in a movie about two GI's from World War II that want to help out the general of their division who is now the owner of a lodge in New England that has fallen on tough times. Crosby and Kaye are Broadway writer and producers who decide to put on a Christmas show at the lodge and have it shown nationwide on TV on something like the Ed Sullivan Show. Rosemary Clooney has never looked better. A classic 1950's movie that says a lot about the times and in glorious color. of course, Bing sings "White Christmas."

1. It's a Wonderful Life (1946)

The Jimmy Stewart, Frank Capra classic about a guy who gives up his dream of college and travel to stay in his small home town and makes it a better place. I never tire of this movie. The Christmas decorations in this movie remind me of the decorations we had when I was a kid. Next to The Duke, Jimmy Stewart was and is my favorite.

Monday, December 10, 2007

Movies this Christmas


One of my favorite things do do during the Christmas Holidays is to take the whole family to the movies.
Hollywood at Christmas time releases a whole batch of movies because it knows the public has extra free time and is looking for some entertainment. Here is a list of the movies I would like to see before the holidays are over.

Already in release:

"I'm Not There"

A movie about Bob Dylan and his music. This may be a hard sell to my wife. It's playing in Ashland , but has not made it to Medford yet. Will it ever play in Medford?

"Atonement"

A movie about a boy in England falsely accused of rape in 1935 at a wealthy English Country estate. Then moves on to World War II and the Blitz in London and Dunkirk. Wild horses can not keep me from seeing this movie. There is already talk of a "Best Picture" nomination.

Opens December 21st

National Treasure -Book of Secrets"

Treasure hunter Benjamin Franklin Gates (Cage) looks to discover the truth behind the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, by uncovering the mystery within the 18 pages missing from assassin John Wilkes Booth's diary. I loved the first movie. History, adventure and fun all in one movie. Makes history fun !

Opens December 25th

"Charlie Wilson's War"

A drama based on a Texas congressman Charlie Wilson's covert dealings in Afghanistan, where his efforts to assist rebels in their war with the Soviets.I have already bloged about this movie and The Wickres will at the theater Christmas Day. Tom Hanks, and director Mike Nichols.

Opens December 28th

"The Great Debaters"

A drama based on the true story of Melvin B. Tolson, a professor at Wiley College Texas. In 1935, he inspired students to form the school's first debate team, which went on to challenge Harvard in the national championship. As an old debater from high school, and some in college, how could I not see this movie? In high school we debaters were the nerds and the foot ball players were the coolguys. Now a movie about us. The "Hoosiers" for debaters!


What a great line up of movies to watch with my kids and wife. Yes, I want butter on my popcorn.

What Hillary's friends are saying about her!


The following quotes are from a column by liberal columnist Al Hunt:

To appreciate Hillary Clinton's fundamental political problem, consider the 11 Democrats from Philadelphia who gathered last week to discuss the U.S. presidential race, almost all of whom would vote for her in a general election.

The focus group was moderated by an expert on such forums, Democratic pollster Peter Hart. The participants were informed and enthusiastic about their party's prospects, had no interest in the Republicans or third-party candidates, and were about equally balanced between front-runners Clinton and Senator Barack Obama of Illinois.

When Hart pushed the group during a two-hour conversation about the strengths and weaknesses of the two candidates, a different picture emerged.....


The concerns about Clinton, 60, a New York senator, are that she is devious, calculating and, fairly or not, a divisive figure in American politics.....


It was revealing, too, when Hart pushed them to envision these senators as leaders of the country or, as he put it, their ``boss.'' Obama, they say, would be inspirational, motivating, charismatic and compassionate. After praising Clinton's experience and intelligence, they say she would be demanding, difficult, maybe even a little scary. Driven by Polls.

Candor and authenticity were repeatedly cited. ``I don't feel like I look at her and see someone who's telling me the whole truth,'' says Allison Lowrey, a 30-year-old human- resources consultant. ``I'd like to see her approach a problem without the polls'' helping her make her decision, says Andrew Alebergo, a 39-year-old tanning-salon operator.

Even strong Hillary supporters acknowledge the electorate's deep-seated concerns. ``She is walking a fine tightrope now, because she is such a divisive personality,'' says Lynda Connelly, a thoughtful 58-year-old Red Cross manager....

This isn't an anti-Hillary crowd.

To read the rest of Al Hunt's column click on the title for a link.

Friday, December 07, 2007

South Medford Wins!



South Medford High tonight started the defense of their 2006/2007 State Basketball Championship with their first game of the new season at home in Medford. They defeated a taller Mountain View High School team from central Oregon near Bend by 25 points. There was a good crowd on hand for the game. All reserved seat have been sold for the season. Michael Harthun, who has signed a letter of intent for Washington State, looked good but so did the other players from South who were extremely fast. We have our old reserved seats and will be back in the stands tomorrow afternoon when South plays Bend High. Go Panthers!

Rudy... Rudy!


There is a news story, this morning, that when Rudy Giuliani was Mayor of New York he had the New York City Police Department provide his girlfriend with security and "taxi" services even before it was publicly known she was his girlfriend and while he was married at the time to Donna Hanover. Apparently these services were at times when he was not with her. This story may have "legs." Last week when it was reported he was provided with police security services when he went to visit her in the Hampton's ,it did not worry me, because he was required to have security every where he went. But, his girlfriend and now wife was not then entitled to taxpayer provided services based on what I now know. I think it is important for Giuliani to get on top of this story, as soon as possible, because it could damage him a great deal among the independent voters to which he appeals. Giuliani you have some explaining to do! This could help John McCain and or Mitt Romney.

(Click on the title for a link to the New York Daily News story)

A Family of Service to America




The top picture is of Senator John McCain's grandfather and father in Tokyo Bay near the time of the surrender of Japan at the end of World War II. Within a few days of this picture his grandfather would be dead His father would also be an admiral in the United States Navy during the Vietnam war. The bottom picture is of the three of them together.

Republicans take another look at John McCain?


The Economist has an article on John McCain today that ends as follows:

There are signs that Republicans are swallowing their doubts about Mr McCain. He is gaining some momentum in New Hampshire (he is barely campaigning in Iowa because he has long ridiculed the absurd ethanol subsidies with which many farmers there line their pockets). The New Hampshire Union Leader gave him a ringing endorsement this week. He is creeping back up the polls nationally, and is now coming second to Mr Giuliani. Republicans need to keep swallowing. Mr McCain is surely worth another look.

(To read the entire article click on the title for a link)

Then this from today's Wall Street Journal:

With one month to go before the Jan. 8 primary here ( New Hampshire), polls show the presidential hopeful regaining some of the ground he lost during the summer because of his support of an immigration bill and his campaign's collapse amid disorganization and poor fund-raising.

Now, Mr. McCain's chief rivals are running into turbulence. Mitt Romney has been overtaken in the polls in Iowa by Mike Huckabee, raising broader concerns about Mr. Romney's viability among the evangelical base. (Please see related article on Page A6.) Rudy Giuliani faces new questions about his ethics as mayor. Fred Thompson continues to be dogged by doubts about his energy for the fight.

All of that may be prompting Republicans to give Mr. McCain a second look -- particularly in New Hampshire. He recently won the endorsement of the state's largest newspaper. And on a weeklong campaign swing this week, he is drawing capacity crowds at the diners and townhall meetings where much of state's campaigning takes place.


Can John McCain be this electrons "Come Back kid"? He has faced greater odds before.... see picture above of his capture in North Vietnam when his navy plane was shot down. Polls over at Real Clear Politics.com are now showing him as having the best chance to beat Hillery if he can get the Republican nomination. I like the Man and his history.

Thursday, December 06, 2007

December 7th 1941



A DAY THAT WILL LIVE IN INFAMY

Mitt Romney and the Mormon Religion


I have not yet decided who I will vote for in the Republican Presidential Primary here in Oregon. It will be between Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani and John McCain. I have almost ruled out Fred Thompson due to his "lack of energy" The fact that Mitt Romney is a Mormon (Later Day Saint) will not influence my vote and I hope it will not influence others. He is a good man and would be a good President.The Republicans are lucky to have substantial men, such as these, running for president.

In my life I have known many Mormons and as in all religions there are good and bad people in any faith.I was actually born in Utah and as a baby was adopted by a Lutheran couple and was raised in the Lutheran religion. My adopted parents moved to Utah during World War II to work at a Navy Supply Depot in Ogden. My uncles on my mom's side also moved to Utah, as well, and married Mormon girls and as a result most of my relatives on my mom's side, who are still alive, are Mormons. My parents while living in Utah experience some discrimination because they were not Mormon. Mormon's tend to be somewhat "clubbish." However, it was not much different than the discrimination others have suffered who lived in other areas of the United States dominated by one religion or another.

When I was in the U.S. Army many of my friends were Mormon. While I occasionally have a drink of alcohol I do not smoke and lead a fairly conservative lifestyle which caused the Mormon guys and I to be very compatible. When my kids were in high school they ran around with a number of Mormon kids because at that age my kids did not drink or smoke. They still don't smoke. For a while I shared office space with a Mormon attorney. One of my best friends in Medford is a fairly recent convert to the Mormon Religion. I can never get a coke at her house unless I bring my own when I go over to watch the Super Bowl! While I can quibble with the doctrine of the Mormon Church I love their emphasis on family and on hard work! I do have a hard time understanding why non members can't go into their temples. I have always disliked private clubs.I am generally an "Optimistic Agnostic" as Winston Churchill described himself. I don't know if there is a God, or not, but I would hope there is. Even though I am not religious, I love religious culture. I love seeing manger scenes and listening to religious music at Christmas. The Christmas story if it isn't true should be true.... it's a wonderful story and I love the Christmas season. There is a place for all religions in America and for those who are not religious!

A few years ago I had a prospective client ask me if I was a "Christian" and said he would not hire me as his attorney if I wasn't. I told him I was an Agnostic and he said he only wanted to hire a Christian attorney and went some place else. The man was a bigot! There may be reasons to pick another candidate over Mitt Romney but his religion is not one of those reasons. He gave a wonderful speech today that all Americans should read and take to heart.

PS if Mitt Romney is elected to the White House I hope he invites the Mormon Tabernacle Choir to sing the "Battle Hymn of the Republic" at his inauguration.... it brings tears to my eyes.

Mitt Romney's Religion Speech


<
Thank you, Mr. President, for your kind introduction.

"It is an honor to be here today. This is an inspiring place because of you and the First Lady and because of the film exhibited across the way in the Presidential library. For those who have not seen it, it shows the President as a young pilot, shot down during the Second World War, being rescued from his life-raft by the crew of an American submarine. It is a moving reminder that when America has faced challenge and peril, Americans rise to the occasion, willing to risk their very lives to defend freedom and preserve our nation. We are in your debt. Thank you, Mr. President.

"Mr. President, your generation rose to the occasion, first to defeat Fascism and then to vanquish the Soviet Union. You left us, your children, a free and strong America. It is why we call yours the greatest generation. It is now my generation's turn. How we respond to today's challenges will define our generation. And it will determine what kind of America we will leave our children, and theirs.

"America faces a new generation of challenges. Radical violent Islam seeks to destroy us. An emerging China endeavors to surpass our economic leadership. And we are troubled at home by government overspending, overuse of foreign oil, and the breakdown of the family.

"Over the last year, we have embarked on a national debate on how best to preserve American leadership. Today, I wish to address a topic which I believe is fundamental to America's greatness: our religious liberty. I will also offer perspectives on how my own faith would inform my Presidency, if I were elected.

"There are some who may feel that religion is not a matter to be seriously considered in the context of the weighty threats that face us. If so, they are at odds with the nation's founders, for they, when our nation faced its greatest peril, sought the blessings of the Creator. And further, they discovered the essential connection between the survival of a free land and the protection of religious freedom. In John Adams’ words: 'We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion... Our constitution was made for a moral and religious people.'

"Freedom requires religion just as religion requires freedom. Freedom opens the windows of the soul so that man can discover his most profound beliefs and commune with God. Freedom and religion endure together, or perish alone.

"Given our grand tradition of religious tolerance and liberty, some wonder whether there are any questions regarding an aspiring candidate's religion that are appropriate. I believe there are. And I will answer them today.

"Almost 50 years ago another candidate from Massachusetts explained that he was an American running for president, not a Catholic running for president. Like him, I am an American running for president. I do not define my candidacy by my religion. A person should not be elected because of his faith nor should he be rejected because of his faith.

"Let me assure you that no authorities of my church, or of any other church for that matter, will ever exert influence on presidential decisions. Their authority is theirs, within the province of church affairs, and it ends where the affairs of the nation begin.

"As governor, I tried to do the right as best I knew it, serving the law and answering to the Constitution. I did not confuse the particular teachings of my church with the obligations of the office and of the Constitution – and of course, I would not do so as President. I will put no doctrine of any church above the plain duties of the office and the sovereign authority of the law.

"As a young man, Lincoln described what he called America's 'political religion' – the commitment to defend the rule of law and the Constitution. When I place my hand on the Bible and take the oath of office, that oath becomes my highest promise to God. If I am fortunate to become your president, I will serve no one religion, no one group, no one cause, and no one interest. A President must serve only the common cause of the people of the United States.

"There are some for whom these commitments are not enough. They would prefer it if I would simply distance myself from my religion, say that it is more a tradition than my personal conviction, or disavow one or another of its precepts. That I will not do. I believe in my Mormon faith and I endeavor to live by it. My faith is the faith of my fathers – I will be true to them and to my beliefs.

"Some believe that such a confession of my faith will sink my candidacy. If they are right, so be it. But I think they underestimate the American people. Americans do not respect believers of convenience.

Americans tire of those who would jettison their beliefs, even to gain the world.

"There is one fundamental question about which I often am asked. What do I believe about Jesus Christ? I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and the Savior of mankind. My church's beliefs about Christ may not all be the same as those of other faiths. Each religion has its own unique doctrines and history. These are not bases for criticism but rather a test of our tolerance. Religious tolerance would be a shallow principle indeed if it were reserved only for faiths with which we agree.

"There are some who would have a presidential candidate describe and explain his church's distinctive doctrines. To do so would enable the very religious test the founders prohibited in the Constitution. No candidate should become the spokesman for his faith. For if he becomes President he will need the prayers of the people of all faiths.

"I believe that every faith I have encountered draws its adherents closer to God. And in every faith I have come to know, there are features I wish were in my own: I love the profound ceremony of the Catholic Mass, the approachability of God in the prayers of the Evangelicals, the tenderness of spirit among the Pentecostals, the confident independence of the Lutherans, the ancient traditions of the Jews, unchanged through the ages, and the commitment to frequent prayer of the Muslims. As I travel across the country and see our towns and cities, I am always moved by the many houses of worship with their steeples, all pointing to heaven, reminding us of the source of life's blessings.

"It is important to recognize that while differences in theology exist between the churches in America, we share a common creed of moral convictions. And where the affairs of our nation are concerned, it's usually a sound rule to focus on the latter – on the great moral principles that urge us all on a common course. Whether it was the cause of abolition, or civil rights, or the right to life itself, no movement of conscience can succeed in America that cannot speak to the convictions of religious people.

"We separate church and state affairs in this country, and for good reason. No religion should dictate to the state nor should the state interfere with the free practice of religion. But in recent years, the notion of the separation of church and state has been taken by some well beyond its original meaning. They seek to remove from the public domain any acknowledgment of God. Religion is seen as merely a private affair with no place in public life. It is as if they are intent on establishing a new religion in America – the religion of secularism. They are wrong.

"The founders proscribed the establishment of a state religion, but they did not countenance the elimination of religion from the public square. We are a nation 'Under God' and in God, we do indeed trust.

"We should acknowledge the Creator as did the Founders – in ceremony and word. He should remain on our currency, in our pledge, in the teaching of our history, and during the holiday season, nativity scenes and menorahs should be welcome in our public places. Our greatness would not long endure without judges who respect the foundation of faith upon which our constitution rests. I will take care to separate the affairs of government from any religion, but I will not separate us from 'the God who gave us liberty.'

"Nor would I separate us from our religious heritage. Perhaps the most important question to ask a person of faith who seeks a political office, is this: does he share these American values: the equality of human kind, the obligation to serve one another, and a steadfast commitment to liberty?

"They are not unique to any one denomination. They belong to the great moral inheritance we hold in common. They are the firm ground on which Americans of different faiths meet and stand as a nation, united.

"We believe that every single human being is a child of God – we are all part of the human family. The conviction of the inherent and inalienable worth of every life is still the most revolutionary political proposition ever advanced. John Adams put it that we are 'thrown into the world all equal and alike.'

"The consequence of our common humanity is our responsibility to one another, to our fellow Americans foremost, but also to every child of God. It is an obligation which is fulfilled by Americans every day, here and across the globe, without regard to creed or race or nationality.

"Americans acknowledge that liberty is a gift of God, not an indulgence of government. No people in the history of the world have sacrificed as much for liberty. The lives of hundreds of thousands of America's sons and daughters were laid down during the last century to preserve freedom, for us and for freedom loving people throughout the world. America took nothing from that Century's terrible wars – no land from Germany or Japan or Korea; no treasure; no oath of fealty. America's resolve in the defense of liberty has been tested time and again. It has not been found wanting, nor must it ever be. America must never falter in holding high the banner of freedom.

"These American values, this great moral heritage, is shared and lived in my religion as it is in yours. I was taught in my home to honor God and love my neighbor. I saw my father march with Martin Luther King. I saw my parents provide compassionate care to others, in personal ways to people nearby, and in just as consequential ways in leading national volunteer movements. I am moved by the Lord's words: 'For I was an hungered, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: naked, and ye clothed me...'

"My faith is grounded on these truths. You can witness them in Ann and my marriage and in our family. We are a long way from perfect and we have surely stumbled along the way, but our aspirations, our values, are the self-same as those from the other faiths that stand upon this common foundation. And these convictions will indeed inform my presidency.

"Today's generations of Americans have always known religious liberty. Perhaps we forget the long and arduous path our nation's forbearers took to achieve it. They came here from England to seek freedom of religion. But upon finding it for themselves, they at first denied it to others. Because of their diverse beliefs, Ann Hutchinson was exiled from Massachusetts Bay, a banished Roger Williams founded Rhode Island, and two centuries later, Brigham Young set out for the West. Americans were unable to accommodate their commitment to their own faith with an appreciation for the convictions of others to different faiths. In this, they were very much like those of the European nations they had left.

"It was in Philadelphia that our founding fathers defined a revolutionary vision of liberty, grounded on self evident truths about the equality of all, and the inalienable rights with which each is endowed by his Creator.

"We cherish these sacred rights, and secure them in our Constitutional order. Foremost do we protect religious liberty, not as a matter of policy but as a matter of right. There will be no established church, and we are guaranteed the free exercise of our religion.

"I'm not sure that we fully appreciate the profound implications of our tradition of religious liberty. I have visited many of the magnificent cathedrals in Europe. They are so inspired … so grand … so empty. Raised up over generations, long ago, so many of the cathedrals now stand as the postcard backdrop to societies just too busy or too 'enlightened' to venture inside and kneel in prayer. The establishment of state religions in Europe did no favor to Europe's churches. And though you will find many people of strong faith there, the churches themselves seem to be withering away.

"Infinitely worse is the other extreme, the creed of conversion by conquest: violent Jihad, murder as martyrdom... killing Christians, Jews, and Muslims with equal indifference. These radical Islamists do their preaching not by reason or example, but in the coercion of minds and the shedding of blood. We face no greater danger today than theocratic tyranny, and the boundless suffering these states and groups could inflict if given the chance.

"The diversity of our cultural expression, and the vibrancy of our religious dialogue, has kept America in the forefront of civilized nations even as others regard religious freedom as something to be destroyed.

"In such a world, we can be deeply thankful that we live in a land where reason and religion are friends and allies in the cause of liberty, joined against the evils and dangers of the day. And you can be certain of this: Any believer in religious freedom, any person who has knelt in prayer to the Almighty, has a friend and ally in me. And so it is for hundreds of millions of our countrymen: we do not insist on a single strain of religion – rather, we welcome our nation's symphony of faith.

"Recall the early days of the First Continental Congress in Philadelphia, during the fall of 1774. With Boston occupied by British troops, there were rumors of imminent hostilities and fears of an impending war. In this time of peril, someone suggested that they pray. But there were objections. 'They were too divided in religious sentiments', what with Episcopalians and Quakers, Anabaptists and Congregationalists, Presbyterians and Catholics.

"Then Sam Adams rose, and said he would hear a prayer from anyone of piety and good character, as long as they were a patriot.

"And so together they prayed, and together they fought, and together, by the grace of God ... they founded this great nation.

"In that spirit, let us give thanks to the divine 'author of liberty.' And together, let us pray that this land may always be blessed, 'with freedom's holy light.'

"God bless the United States of America."

Wednesday, December 05, 2007

A Dam* Shame!


Dennis Dixon was NOT one of the finalist invited to New York for the Heisman Ceremony!

Tuesday, December 04, 2007

"Civil War" Weekend


Considering the outcome of the Oregon vs Oregon State game I had a very nice week end that could have only been better if the Ducks had won. Our adult daughter flew home to Medford to go to the game with "The Old Man". I raised her to be a Duck fan but it is tough to go to Duck games when you live in Washington DC. As I posted earlier in the fall, she and her brother went to the Michigan game in Ann Arbor. She then made reservations before Dennis Dixon when down to fly out for the Civil War Game Weekend. She arrived in Medford on Thursday afternoon and we took her out to dinner at the Red Robbin and then took her home to show her the results of all our home improvement projects.She has not been home since last Christmas. We had seen her when we went to Europe together in August and met her for a wedding in Lacy Washington last February. However this is the first time she has been home in almost a year. We topped off the night by watching the Ducks beat Kansas State in overtime, in Basketball, at Kansas State, on TV.

Friday my wife took the day off from the office and she and our daughter spent the day together, going to the Festival of the Trees, shopping and had a nice lunch out. After I got off from work we all went out to the Bella Union in Jacksonville for Pizza. We arrived just as they were starting the Jacksonville Christmas Parade for their "Victorian Christmas"

On Saturday we left Medford at 8 AM for our trip to Eugene for the "Civil War" game. On the way out of town we stopped by Donut Country for their great Donuts. She said she had been unable to find donuts as good as Donut Country's, anywhere in Washington DC. We got to Eugene and parked our car on the campus side of the Willamette River and took the Footbridge over the river and through the woods to Autzen Stadium. I had purchased some "Club Seats" and we picked them up at "Will Call" and then walked thorough the Mo Center and it's giant tail gate party. We then went up the escalators to the "Club at Autzen"and had a nice lunch with a view of the woods. We ran into some friends from Medford. We then went to our "Club Seats" on the 50 yard line just three rows below Phil Knights sky box suite. Then my daughter said she wanted, for old time sake, to go over to our season ticket seats in Section 13 on the other side of the stadium. We agreed we would go over there for the first half and then come back to the "Club Seats" for the second half. It soon became clear that lots of Duck fans had bailed on the Ducks and sold or given their tickets to the Beaver fans. There was this awful orange all over the stadium and not just in the visitors section. There were even Beavers in the "Club at Autzen". What were these duck fans thinking? The game started and we had a great time up until the end. Quite frankly deep down I though the Beavers would win but my Ducks made a game of it, in spite of all their injuries. The game was tied at the half and we were so excited we decided to stay in our season ticket seats in section 13 where we were in the company of folks we have celebrated many a victory with. The score was tied at the end of regulation play and then the Ducks lost in double overtime. The game had been like a roller coaster ride. At one point we were hugging each other and giving each other "High 5's" and at other times we were so depressed. After the game we joined the great exodus over the footbridge and back to our car. We then drove home to Medford and got home about 9 pm.

Due to some flight delays our daughter was unable to fly out of Medford on Sunday as planed so we all went to a movie at Tinsel Town. We then watched the BCS program on TV and learned the Ducks were going to the Sun Bowl. We topped off Sunday night by watching the Movie "Amazing Grace" on DVD in my movie room. On Monday I took her out to breakfast at Elmer's on the way to the airport and said good by. She will be home for Christmas in a few weeks. All in all a very good weekend. We are lucky parents!

Sunday, December 02, 2007

Ducks to Sun Bowl! Oh NO!

The Oregon State Beavers were passed over by the Sun bowl because they had been there last year.
No I am not happy about it! If we are going to a "minor" bowl I would have much preferred going to San Francisco and the Emerald Bowl. I know the Sun Bowl is a more prestigious bowl than the Emerald but who want to go to El Paso Texas. The payout for the Sun Bowl is 1.9 million dollars vs $750,000 for the Emerald bowl. The Pac 10 should have gotten the conference out of this bowl a long time ago. I seriously doubt that many Duck fans will go to this bowl. It's a long car trip from Oregon and flying is very expensive which will limit the number of Ducks who can attend. The Beavers are unhappy to be passed over by the Sun but their fans will have much more fun in San Francisco. I have been to El Paso and I will never go back. There are a lot of nice folks in El Paso and the Sun Bowl organizers put on a good program for the players but I am not sure the team will be very motivated for this game. I hope I am wrong and will be taking part of the day off from work so I can watch the game on TV. I am afraid this will be another in a long string of Bowl defeats for the Ducks since they won the Fiesta Bowl on New Years Day 2002 (Seattle Bowl 2002, Sun Bowl 2003, Holiday Bowl 2005, and Las Vegas Bowl 2006 were all defeats) Prove me wrong Ducks! The game is on CBS and will be shown on a work day (December 31st) at 11 am PST. A real great time to watch a bowl game (sarcasm).

Friday, November 30, 2007

Civil War... Stand Firm Duck Fans!


I AM a Duck Fan! And I see a whole army of other Duck Fans, here, in defiance of a Beaver victory. You've come to yell as fans, and Duck Fans you are. What will you do at Autzen today? Will you yell?
Fan: Against the Beavers? No, we will stay home, and we will avoid embarrassment.
Duck Fan: Aye, stay and yell and you may may be embarrassed, stay home and you may avoid embarrassment ... at least a while. And dying in your beds, many years from now, would you be willin' to trade ALL the days, from this day to that, for one chance, just one chance, to come back here and beat the Beavers! Tell the Beavers that they may win the game, but they'll never be Duck Fans!!!

The "Civil War" Game!



The car is packed and "Ducked Out" and we are ready to roll! I hate the Beavers and so want to beat them tomorrow. Oregon is a team that has been a on a roller coaster ride this year and we are as low as we have been in a long time. Our 4th string quarterback is starting tomorrow against one of the best defenses in the Pac-10.Our receivers are for the most part injured. I have never seen Duck fans so low. It's time to rise up and strike the Beavers. Rally to Cody Kemp and lets leave everything on the field. It's not about a bowl game or rankings,it's about pride. Let's Go Ducks!

I get all the news I need in the weather report


The weather forecast for Saturdays "Civil War" game in Eugene Oregon between the Oregon Ducks and the Oregon State Beavers is 39 degrees Fahrenheit with a wind chill factor of 31 degrees. Chance of rain 60 % with winds 10 to 20 miles per hour.The Oregonian is reporting a big storm with snow in northern Oregon and southern Washington with high winds. If that moves south to Eugene we could have snow during the "Civil War" game. That's what you get for scheduling a football game in Oregon in December for TV. I will be there unless the mountain passes between Medford and Eugene are closed. Go Ducks..... win the Day.

The "Civil War"


As I have said before Oregonian sports columnist John Canzano makes me so angry sometimes I swear I will not read his column ever again. However, today his column is about the fact the "Civil War still has meaning" and he writes about two soldiers stationed in Iraq. One a Duck and one a Beaver.He writes in part:

Someone tell me again how the Civil War has lost its luster. How a rash of frustrating injuries have reduced its meaning. Someone tell me how ugly, and how futile, and how much of a comedown the whole thing is.

Tell me.

Then, tell the two soldiers who climbed on the burned-out Iraqi tank this week at Baghdad International Airport and hung a couple of Ducks and Beavers flags.

ioned in Iraq. One a Duck and the other a Beaver. ....

Hill and Jee took their flags out of their bags this week, and they climbed on top of a destroyed Iraqi tank that was left behind from the 2003 invasion. And they hung the respective flags, and raised their weapons and posed for photographs. And they told each other they couldn't wait to watch Saturday's Civil War football game from the capital city of Iraq.

Never mind that the game kicks off at 12:30 a.m. Baghdad time on Sunday morning. They'll stay up and watch. And cheer. And it will feel like a tiny piece of home coming to them at some quiet hour of a real war.......

So tell me again that this year's Civil War game stinks. And that the injuries have deflated the run-up to kickoff for you. And that the rivalry suddenly feels decumbent, and less attractive, because there should have been a BCS berth on the line.

Tell me.

Then, tell the guys on the tank.

And duck after you do.

( to read the entire column click on the title for a link)

Life is funny


Yesterday afternoon my wife an I went out to the Medford, Jackson County International Airport to pick up our daughter who was flying in from Washington DC to go with me to the Oregon vs Oregon State "Civil War" football game in Eugene on Saturday. I even bought some "Club Seats" from a Medford fan who is unable to make the game for work reason to supplement our regular season tickets in section 13. Our daughter has never been in "The Club At Autzen."

Well last night after she had settled in we went down to my "movie room" to watch the Oregon Duck basketball game on ESPN 2. They were playing Kansas State from Manhattan Kansas. The Ducks won in overtime. As I was watching the game I was thinking back to my days as a young law student at the University of Oregon watching in "The Pit" a then young Ernie Kent (Oregon's current coach) as a player. He had a nick name of "Million Moves Kent." ( I am tempted to talk more of how that name has become even funner but that would be wrong)In any case, I wonder what I would have though if I had been told back then as I sat in "The Pit" that one day Ernie Kent will be the Oregon's Head Coach and I will be watching him coach a game with a grown daughter who works in government in Washington DC. on a cable TV network devoted entirely to sports, surrounded by my own personal copy's of 600 + of my favorite movies on little record like discs smaller than a 45 record.

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Malt Shop Memories



As regular readers of this blog know, I purchased the Time/Life CD compilation set of 1950's and early 1960's rock music called "Malt Shop Memories" which is sold through infomercials on TV. I love this set. Because I have purchase a lot of music through Time/Life I get email ads from them regularly.

Today's ad suggested various music sets for various members of the family such as "For Your daughter" this set .... "For you Mother" this set.... " For you Dad" this set etc. For "Malt shop Memories it said "For you Grandfather" Did I feel old!

Henry Hyde, Dead at 83


A true gentlman died today. Former Rep. Henry Hyde, the Illinois Republican who steered the impeachment proceedings against President Clinton and a hero of the Right to Life movement, died Thursday. He was 83.


The death of the Illinois Republican was announced by House Minority Leader John Boehner's office on Capitol Hill.

Mary Ann Schultz, a spokeswoman for Rush University Medical Center, said Hyde died Thursday at 3 a.m. CST at that hospital. There was no immediate word on the cause of his death, although Hyde underwent open-heart surgery in July.

Hyde retired from Congress at the end of the last session. Earlier this month, President Bush presented him with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. The White House praised Hyde, a leading foe of abortion, as a "powerful defender of life" and an advocate for a strong national defense.

"He was a gallant champion of the weak and forgotten, and a fearless defender of life in all its seasons," Bush said of Hyde that day.

Boehner, R-Ohio, said in a statement: "What often struck me most about Henry was his keen sense of our nation's history and of the gifts bestowed on our Republic by the Founding Fathers, whose actions and deeds were never far from his mind. In his respect for the institutional integrity of the House of Representatives, Henry took second place to no one. He was a forceful advocate for maintaining the dignity of the House and for recognizing the sacrifices and struggles members make while in its service. Indeed, when Henry spoke in Committee or on the House floor, Members on both sides of aisle listened intently and they learned."

Said Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, who heads the conservative Republican Study Committee: "Chairman Hyde was a pioneer in the effort to protect human life, and because of his tireless efforts, there are thousands of people living around the world today who remember his service to mankind."

"Henry Hyde was a credit to public service and to the House of Representatives," said Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, chairman of the Judiciary Committee. "He practiced the old school values like civility, which help make the legislative process work. And he knew how to defuse a difficult situation with humor."

The white-maned, physically imposing Hyde was a throwback to a different era, a man who was genuinely liked by his opponents for his wit, charm and fairness. But he could also infuriate them with his positions on some of the more controversial issues of the day.


I will never forget the speech he gave on the floor of the United States House of Representative when he led the debate in favor of the impeachment of William Jefferson Clinton , President of the United States. He said "catch the falling flag." The full text of his speech made December 18, 1998 is as follows:
"Mr. Speaker, my colleagues of the people’s House, I wish to talk to you about the rule of law. After months of argument, hours of debate, there is no need for further complexity. The question before this House is rather simple. It’s not a question of sex. Sexual misconduct and adultery are private acts and are none of Congress’ business.

It’s not even a question of lying about sex. The matter before the House is a question of lying under oath. This is a public act, not a private act. This is called perjury. The matter before the House is a question of the willful, premeditated, deliberate corruption of the nation’s system of justice. Perjury and obstruction of justice cannot be reconciled with the office of the president of the United States.

The personal fate of the president is not the issue. The political fate of his party is not the issue. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is not the issue. The issue is perjury ---- lying under oath. The issue is obstruction of justice, which the president has sworn the most solemn oath to uphold.

That oath constituted a compact between the president and the American people. That compact has been broken. The people’s trust has been betrayed. The nation’s chief executive has shown himself unwilling or incapable of enforcing its laws for he has corrupted the rule of law ---- the rule of law ---- by his perjury and his obstruction of justice.

That and nothing other than that is the issue before this house.

We have heard ceaselessly that, even if the president is guilty of the charges in the Starr referral, they don’t rise to the level of an impeachable offense.

Well, just what is an impeachable offense?

One authority, Professor Stephen Presser of Northwestern University Law School said, and I quote, "Impeachable offenses are those which demonstrate a fundamental betrayal of public trust. They suggest the federal official has deliberately failed in his duty to uphold the Constitution and laws he was sworn to enforce." Close quote.

And so we must decide if a president, the chief law enforcement officer of the land, the person who appoints the attorney general, the person who nominates every federal judge, the person who nominates to the Supreme Court and the only person with a constitutional obligation to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, can lie under oath repeatedly and maintain it is not a breach of trust sufficient for impeachment.

The president is the trustee of the nation’s conscience and so are we here today. There have been many explosions in our committee hearings on the respective role of the House and Senate. Under the Constitution, the House accuses and the Senate adjudicates.

True, the formula language of our articles recites the ultimate goal of removal from office, but this language doesn’t trump the Constitution, which defines the separate functions, the different functions, of the House and the Senate.

Our Founding Fathers didn’t want the body that accuses to be the same one that renders final judgment, and they set up an additional safeguard of a two-thirds vote for removal. So despite protests, our job is to decide if there is enough evidence to submit to the Senate for a trial.

That’s what the Constitution says, no matter what the president’s defenders say. When Ben Franklin, on September 18, 1787, told a Mrs. Powell, that the founders and framers had given us a republic if you can keep it, perhaps he anticipated a future time when bedrock principles of our democracy would be mortally threatened as the rule of law stands in the line of fire today.

Nothing I can think of more clearly illustrates that America is a continuing experiment, never finished; that our democracy is always a work in progress. Then this debate today ---- for we sit here with the power to shake and reconfigure the charter of our freedom, just as the founders and framers did. We can strengthen our Constitution by giving it content and meaning, or we can weaken and wound it by tolerating and thus encouraging lies under oath and evasions and breaches of trust on the part of our chief executive.

The president’s defenders in this House have rarely denied the facts. They have not seriously challenged the contention of the independent counsel that the president did not tell the truth in two sworn testimonies. They have not seriously attempted to discredit the facts brought before the committee by the independent counsel. They’ve admitted, in effect, he did it. But then they’ve argued that this does not rise to the level of an impeachable offense.

This is the "so-what" defense, whereby a chief executive, the successor to George Washington, can cheapen the oath, and it really doesn’t matter.

They suggest that to impeach the president is to reverse the result of national election, as though Senator Dole would become president.

They propose novel remedies like a congressional censure that may appease some constituents and certainly mollify the press but, in my judgment, betray a lack of seriousness about the Constitution, the separation of powers and the carefully balanced relationship of checks and balances between Congress and the president that was wisely crafted by the framers.

A resolution of censure, to mean anything, must punish if only to tarnish his reputation. But we have no authority under the Constitution to punish the president. It’s called separation of powers.

As you know, we’ve been attacked for not producing fact witnesses. But this is the first impeachment inquiry in history with the Office of Independent Counsel in place, and their referral to us consisted of 60,000 pages of sworn testimony, grand jury transcripts, depositions, statements, affidavits, video and audio tapes.

We had the facts and we had them under oath.

We had Ms. Lewinsky’s heavily corroborated testimony under a grant of immunity that would be revoked if she lied.

We accepted that and so did they. Else why didn’t they call any others whose credibility they questioned as their own witnesses? Now there was so little despite on the facts, they called no fact witnesses and have even based a resolution of censure on the same facts.

Let’s be clear. The vote that all of us are asked to cast is, in the final analysis, a vote on the rule of law.

Now the rule of law is one of the great achievements of our civilization, for the alternative is the rule of raw power. We here today are the heirs of 3,000 years of history in which humanity slowly, painfully, at great cost evolved a form of politics in which law, not brute force, is the arbiter of our public destinies.

We are the heirs of the Ten Commandments and the Mosaic Law, a moral code for a free people, who, having been liberated from bondage, sought in law a means to avoid falling back into the habits of slaves.

We are the heirs of Roman Law, the first legal system by which peoples of different cultures, languages, races and religions came to live together in a form of political community.

We are the heirs of the Magna Carta, by which the free men of England began to break the arbitrary and unchecked power of royal absolutism. We’re the heirs of a long tradition of parliamentary development in which the rule of law gradually came to replace royal prerogative as a means for governing a society of free men and women.

We’re the heirs of 1776 and of an epic moment in human affairs, when the founders of this Republic pledged their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honors. Think of that ---- sacred honor ---- to the defense of the rule of law.

We are the heirs of a hard-fought war between the states, which vindicated the rule of law over the appetites of some for owning others. We are the heirs of the ah century’s great struggles against totalitarianism, in which the rule of law was defended at immense cost against the worst tyrannies in human history.

The phrase "rule of law" is no pious aspiration from a civics textbook. The rule of law is what stands between all of us and the arbitrary exercise of power by the state. The rule of law is the safeguard of our liberties. The rule of law is what allows us to live our freedom in ways that honor the freedom of others, while strengthening the common good.

The rule of law is like a three-legged stool. One leg is an honest judge, the second leg is an ethical bar, and the third is an enforceable oath. All three are indispensable to avoid political collapse.

In 1838, Abraham Lincoln celebrated the rule of law before the Young Men’s Lyceum of Springfield, Illinois, and linked it to the perpetuation of American liberties and American political institutions. Listen to Lincoln, from 1838: "Let every American, every lover of liberty, every well-wisher to his posterity, swear by the blood of the revolution never to violate in the least particular the laws of the country; and never to tolerate their violation by others. As the patriots of ’76 did to support the Declaration of Independence, so the support of the Constitution and laws, let every American pledge his life, his property and his sacred honor. Let every man remember that to violate the law is to trample on the blood of his father and to tear the character of his own and his children’s liberty.

"Let reverence for the laws be breathed by every American mother to the lisping babe that prattles on her lap. Let it be taught in the schools, seminaries, colleges. Let it be written in primers, spelling books, almanacs. Let it be preached from the pulpit, proclaimed in legislative halls and enforced in the halls of ---- in the courts of justice."

So said Lincoln.

My colleagues, we have been sent here to strengthen and defend the rule of law ---- not to weaken, not to attenuate it, not to disfigure it. This is not a question of perfection; it’s a question of foundations.

This isn’t a matter of setting the bar too high; it’s a matter of securing the basic structure of our freedom ---- which is the rule of law.

No man or woman, no matter how highly placed, no matter how effective a communicator, no matter how gifted a manipulator of opinion or winner of votes, can be above the law in a democracy. That is not a counsel of perfection. That is a rock-bottom, irreducible principle of our public life.

There’s no avoiding the issue before us, much as I wish we could. We are, in one way or another, establishing the parameters of permissible presidential conduct.

In creating a presidential system, the framers invested that office with extraordinary powers. If those powers are not exercised within the boundaries of the rule of law, if the president breaks the law by perjury and obstructs justice by willfully corrupting the legal system, that president must be removed from office.

We cannot have one law for the ruler and another law for the ruled. This was once broadly understood in our land. If that understanding is lost or if it becomes seriously eroded, the American democratic experiment and the freedom it guarantees is in jeopardy. That and not the fate of one man, or one political party, or one electoral cycle is what we’re being asked to vote on today.

In casting our votes we should look not simply to ourselves, but to the past and to the future. Let’s look back to Bunker Hill, Concord, Lexington. Let’s look across the river to Arlington Cemetery where American heroes who gave their lives for the sake of the rule of law lie buried. And let us not betray their memory.

Let’s look to the future, to the children of today who are the presidents and members of Congress of the next century. And let’s not crush their hope that they too will inherent a law-governed society.

Let’s declare unmistakably the perjury and obstruction of justice disqualify a man from retaining the presidency of the United States.

There is a mountain of details which are assembled in a coherent mosaic in the committee report. It reads like a novel, only it’s non-fiction. It really happened. And the corroboration is compelling. Read the report and be convinced.

What we’re telling you today are not the ravings of some vindictive political crusade but a reaffirmation of a set of values that are tarnished and dim these days, but it is given to us to restore them so our founding fathers would be proud.

Listen, it’s your country. The president is our flag bearer.

He stands out in front our people when the flag is flowing. Catch the falling flag as we keep our appointment with history."


Thanks for your service and Rest in Peace. I wish we had more like Henry Hyde in Washington DC .... but I am afraid he is a dieing breed!

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Clinton Dirty Tricks!



Tonight I watched the CNN-YouTube Republican Presidential debate in CNN hosted by Anderson Cooper CNN anchorman.One of the most dramatic moments was when Keith Kerr a self proclaimed Gay man and a retired U.S. Army Colonel submitted
a YouTube question to the Republicans about gays in the military. It turns out he is actually a member of Hillary Clinton's Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transsexual Americans For Hillary Steering Committee. All of the questions were submitted electronically through YouTube. However, after the Republicans had answered his question, Anderson Cooper, introduced Kerr who was sitting in the audience and ask him if he had gotten an answer to his question. Keith Kerr was given a microphone and launched into a speech and CNN let him continue for long time....longer than Anderson Cooper was allowing the Republican candidates to answer questions. Cooper had no hesitancy interrupting the Republicans if they went too long on an answer but let Kerr continue without interruption. It turns out that Kerr was a plant from the Hillery Clinton camp. In the final seconds of the post-debate coverage, Anderson Cooper acknowledges that CNN messed this up and states that CNN did not know that Kerr had or has a position within the Clinton campaign and that had they known, they would have disclosed the association if they had used his question. At best CNN was negligent at worst there was complicity with the Clinton camp. I find it interesting that the Democratic candidates refuse to appear on FOX News for debates due to pressure from their loony left. On the other hand Republican candidates willingly appear on CNN and are treated unfairly either by negligence or on purpose.As far as I could tell from watching the debate Kerry was the only YouTube questioner who was introduced from the audience and let offer a rebuttal! Why the exception? For more information on Anderson Cooper pictured above click on the title above for a link to his page on Wikiedia the Internet encyclopedia.

UPDATE:David Bohrman, a CNN senior vice president and executive producer of the debate, said: "We regret this, and apologize to the Republican candidates. We never would have used the general's question had we known that he was connected to any presidential candidate."

Kerr told CNN that he had not done work for the Clinton campaign, and CNN verified before the debate that he had not contributed money to any candidate, the broadcaster said in a blog post after the debate.

Kerry told CNN he is a member of the Log Cabin Republicans and was representing no one other than himself, CNN said.

A Nov. 11 press release retrieved from the website of the non-partisan magazine Campaigns & Elections lists Kerr as one of nearly 50 co-chairs of “Veterans and Military Retirees for Hillary."

Clinton’s campaign did not respond to an e-mail asking about Kerr’s role in her campaign or whether he was acting on behalf of the campaign.

Kerr also was on 2004 Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry’s National Veterans Steering Committee, according to a campaign press release retrieved from the website of George Washington University.

And Kerr appears to be an active opponent of the U.S. military’s current stance on gays and lesbians serving the military, the so-called “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy.

"Civil War" Week




Here in Oregon this is Civil War Week. That is the Week of the University of Oregon vs Oregon State University football game.. Some one said this game "is for the right to live in the state of Oregon" or at least the right to live in the state of Oregon with your head held high. This is one of the oldest college football rivalries. Here in Oregon Ducks and Beavers can be found in most offices, families and neighborhoods. It's brother vs brother, neighbor vs neighbor and coworker vs co worker so it truly is a Civil War.

One of my favorite Civil War stories is from World War II. One of the Band of Brothers featured in the HBO mini series, Don Malarkey, is a University of Oregon alum. His studies were interrupted by WWII and he was in the paratroopers in England preparing for the D- Day invasion. Eisenhower and Churchill came to view his unit before the beginning of the invasion and Ike asks Malarkey what he did before the war. He said he was a student at the University of Oregon in Eugene, and Ike asks him who won the last Oregon vs Oregon State Football game. Of course Ike played football for Army at West Point.

It is fun to walk around the tailgate parties before the game because you see Ducks and Beavers together. There is a scene in the movie Gettysburg where a confederate general tells a British Army officer who is there as an observer just before Pickett's charge that "All Virginia is here today". At each Oregon vs Oregon State Football game I like to think "all Oregon is here today."

Jon Wilner, of the San Jose Mercury news in California rates the rivalry football games in the Pac-10 and rates the "Civil War" game as the #1 rivalry game when he says:

1. The Civil War.

These days, Oregon-Oregon State has the best combination of passion, significance and competitiveness.

The passion takes the form of hatred — much closer to the Arizona-ASU situation than a healthy dislike.

OSU looks with jealousy at its richer, more-famous, more hip neighbor and wonders what might have been if Phil Knight had gone to OSU. The Ducks hate OSU because they’ve been told to hate OSU for decades.

The games are usually high scoring, although not always close, and the home team has dominated this decade.

Most importantly, you can’t go more than two or three Civil Wars without the stakes being high — sometimes for both teams.

Five times this decade, the Ducks have won at least eight games. The Beavers are on the verge of doing it for the fourth time.

Without question, Oregon and Oregon State have been the most successful natural rivals in the conference in recent years. And that makes the Civil War the league’s best rivalry.

For now.
( To read about the other Pac-10 Rivalry games click on the title above for a link to Wilner's column)

I learned to hate the Beavers a long time ago in the late 1960's and early 1970's when the Beavers regularly under coach Dee Andros,( The Great Pumpkin) beat the shi* out of Oregon Duck Teams and did it with such relish.


A few years ago Dee, long retired, not too long before his death, came to a joint Duck/Beaver "Civil War" lunch in Medford and gave a passionate speech about the "Civil War" game that made me want to strap on a helmet and start playing right there. When Dee Andros walked into the banquet room he was wearing a god awful bright orange blazer and a black and orange striped tie. A local young TV sports reporter, who had probabley just moved to this area, walked up to him and asked him if he was an Oregon State fan and it brought a smile to my face.
(Dee Andros was a veteran of World War II where he served four years in the U.S. Marine Corps. He was awarded the Bronze Star and spent more than a month under heavy fire on Iwo Jima. He was present at the famed moment when six soldiers raised the American flag on Iwo Jima.)

Go Ducks beat the Beavers.

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

"And A Rock Feels No Pain"



To night my wife and I went to the Oregon Club of Southern Oregon's annual "Civil War" dinner at the Rogue Valley Country Club. University of Oregon Athletic Director Pat Kilkenny and Assistant AD Jim Bartko came down from Eugene for the dinner. Football Coach Mike Bellotti spoke from Eugene on a telephone speakerphone. We had a nice time and it's always good to get together with Duck Fans. The Dinner had the feel of a reception after a funeral. The kind where people celebrate the life of the deceased rather than morn the deceased. As some one said it's hard work being a Duck Fan. When I got home I found a nice column from today's Eugene Register Guard by non sports, lifestyle columnist Bob Welch. He talks about where he was when he heard the news that Dennis Dixon had torn his ACl and would never play for the Ducks again and compared him to Steve Prefontaine in the mythology of Oregon sports history. He talked about what it was like being a Duck fan. He says in part:

.....Amid the absolute best — and, at the moment, worst — Oregon football season in history, I’ve been thinking about those of us who consider ourselves sports fans. And I’ve concluded that hitching your wagon to a team or player is a lot like hitching your wagon to anyone or anything.

In every relationship, there’s a price to pay for the benefit you receive. For Duck fans, the bill simply came at the worst possible time — Oregon positioning itself for a run at a national title and quarterback Dennis Dixon for a run at the Heisman Trophy. And was far higher than the usual we-lost-a-game variety......

Against the odds, Duck football had arrived this fall. And so when Dixon went down, I found myself thinking: Is this really happening?

After the Ducks’ loss to UCLA last Saturday, the answer was as stark as a visitor’s “0” on the Rose Bowl scoreboard: Yes, it is.

Our worst nightmare.

It’s not fair, some have said about the Ducks’ riches-to-rags season. Nope. But, then, if sports is a microcosm of life, why would we expect it to be?

Some deadbeat dad wins the lottery while model parents lose a child. Hurricane Katrina hammers the poor while O.J. beats the rap.....

And so it is that some choose, in the Simon-&-Garfunkelian model, to not commit or de-commit, because “a rock feels no pain.” True, but a rock also feels nothing. Ever.

After the 2002 Seattle Bowl, in which Oregon was humiliated by Wake Forest while Husky backers laughed in our rain-splattered faces, I returned home thinking this fan stuff just wasn’t worth it.( My son and I were there and felt the same way as we drove from Seattle back to my sisters home in Portland..... it rained so hard on the trip down I-5 I though God must have been crying I know I felt like it..... we stopped in a McDonald's about an hour from Seattle on the freeway and It was full of Duck fans and the place was sooo quite)

But four games later, I watched UO beat Michigan in endless Autzen sunshine. It felt like a perfect day. This season alone, I’ve watched or heard three unbelievable wins over Michigan, USC and Arizona State.....

I’ve seen Dixon emerge from the depths of despair to join Pre and the two Lukes as UO athletes for the ages......

But what will never bedoesn’t wipe out what was. Or preclude Duck fans from hoping for better days, be it next year or Saturday.

On paper, of course, there’s nothing to suggest Oregon can muster the offense to beat Oregon State in the Civil War. But the wonder of sports is that you never know.....



He ends by essentially saying we keep coming back because we want to know what happens next.

Our daughter is flying out from Washington DC for the weekend and will go with me to Eugene for the game. She made her reservations before Dennis Dixon when down. We know the odds are against an Oregon win which will make a victory all the more sweet and will dull the feeling of defeat if the Duck do go down. Regardless of the score we will spend the day together and in the grand scale of life that is a win.

Beat the Beaver....... Let's go Ducks!


( To read Welch's full column click on the title for a link)